If I remember rightly, female masturbation is not strictly a sin. Male maturbation is because it is the old concept of "wasting seed" - the "sin" of Onan.
All of this goes back to people in power making rules for the rest. If you can control the populace by imposing laws, back them up with frightening religious myths and then, via those myths, control the most powerful human instinct - sexuality - you have it made.
Then of course you have the power to do what you wish, including breaking your own laws which those in power have done from time immemorial.
Sexual laws and sexual abuse were there long before Christianity and in places where Christianity has had little or no impact.
It isn't just Catholic priests who have indulged - but they are probably the most self righteous group to ever have been accused of abuse and molestation
Sex Crimes and the Vatican
Re: Sex Crimes and the Vatican
In 1st century Rome, the Christians were considered a dangerous terrorist sect. Nero was probably right in his view that they caused the fire which partially destroyed the city. He perhaps went a bit too far burning them alive and throwing them to the lions. It is also interesting to note that such excesses did not stop when Rome became Christian. Other unfortunates were murdered for the entertainment of the masses. This did not stop until Rome was taken over by the so called barbarians.
-
Officer Dibble
- Posts: 2372
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Sex Crimes and the Vatican
Mike, your posts are always worth a read. Your scribblings range from the clear, concise, learned and insightful, to the bizarre and surreal - like this Daliesque (or photo-takeresque) piece
"In a female intelligence manifests itself in the ability to be sexually attractive to chosen males. There is a lot of propaganda about beautiful and attractive young girls being bimbos but never forget Marilyn Monroe!"
I think I get your drift, and I might even have some sympathy with the sentiment ? but what?s all this ?propaganda? about bimbos? Who's spouting it, and why? You say female intelligence manifests itself in the ability to be sexually attractive ? but doesn?t it also manifest itself in the ability to be an accountant or layer? And how precisely does Marilyn fit into all this?
Also, you seem to be suggesting that it is unnatural, unfair, and a societal aberration that girls under 16 are not allowed to shag adult blokes (and in particular ?older? blokes - like your good self). Are you therefore suggesting the country would be a much better place if all the fathers in these fair isles opened their doors and welcomed you in to deflower their 14-year-old daughters? Are you suggesting that this might be a, beautiful, warm, and indeed, spiritual experience - an experience that any teenage girl and her father might cherish and hold dear - if it were not for the evil propagandists who make out that older blokes ?interfering? with young girls is pervy and objectionable?
Also, how do you feel about women of your own age? Don?t you find them attractive at all? Don?t they find you attractive? How long have you had this obsession with teenage girls? When (or if) you get to speak to them do you find you have much in common with them? Do you have the same music on your iPod? Do you vote for the same divis on ?Big Brother?? Do you have a subscription to ?Heat? magazine? Do you dig Benson and Hedges or Bacardi Breezers? Do you favour Tenerife or Faleraki? These are all fascinating questions that follow on from the unabashed airing of your sexual proclivities.
Officer Dibble
"In a female intelligence manifests itself in the ability to be sexually attractive to chosen males. There is a lot of propaganda about beautiful and attractive young girls being bimbos but never forget Marilyn Monroe!"
I think I get your drift, and I might even have some sympathy with the sentiment ? but what?s all this ?propaganda? about bimbos? Who's spouting it, and why? You say female intelligence manifests itself in the ability to be sexually attractive ? but doesn?t it also manifest itself in the ability to be an accountant or layer? And how precisely does Marilyn fit into all this?
Also, you seem to be suggesting that it is unnatural, unfair, and a societal aberration that girls under 16 are not allowed to shag adult blokes (and in particular ?older? blokes - like your good self). Are you therefore suggesting the country would be a much better place if all the fathers in these fair isles opened their doors and welcomed you in to deflower their 14-year-old daughters? Are you suggesting that this might be a, beautiful, warm, and indeed, spiritual experience - an experience that any teenage girl and her father might cherish and hold dear - if it were not for the evil propagandists who make out that older blokes ?interfering? with young girls is pervy and objectionable?
Also, how do you feel about women of your own age? Don?t you find them attractive at all? Don?t they find you attractive? How long have you had this obsession with teenage girls? When (or if) you get to speak to them do you find you have much in common with them? Do you have the same music on your iPod? Do you vote for the same divis on ?Big Brother?? Do you have a subscription to ?Heat? magazine? Do you dig Benson and Hedges or Bacardi Breezers? Do you favour Tenerife or Faleraki? These are all fascinating questions that follow on from the unabashed airing of your sexual proclivities.
Officer Dibble
-
eroticartist
- Posts: 2941
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Sex Crimes and the Vatican
Dibble.
Marilyn Monroe was having an affair with the President of the United States of America remember. She had attracted the most powerful man in the land.
Girls of fourteen usually shag guys usually a bit older than theirselves, which is perfectly natural. Their sex lives are private and it should be no business of anyone else,including the state or you.The authoritarian state will always attempt to control the sex of youth because control is conrol per se. Control the sex,control the person. The Catholic Church use the same brainwashing techniques.
The only young girls I meet these days are my daughters starting at fourty and ending at three my youngest. Iam a family man you see. A gentleman of honour.
My partner at the moment is a beautiful woman in her fourties by whom I have two beautiful children. I am happy Dibble
Mike.
Marilyn Monroe was having an affair with the President of the United States of America remember. She had attracted the most powerful man in the land.
Girls of fourteen usually shag guys usually a bit older than theirselves, which is perfectly natural. Their sex lives are private and it should be no business of anyone else,including the state or you.The authoritarian state will always attempt to control the sex of youth because control is conrol per se. Control the sex,control the person. The Catholic Church use the same brainwashing techniques.
The only young girls I meet these days are my daughters starting at fourty and ending at three my youngest. Iam a family man you see. A gentleman of honour.
My partner at the moment is a beautiful woman in her fourties by whom I have two beautiful children. I am happy Dibble
Mike.
amazon.com/author/freeman
-
Officer Dibble
- Posts: 2372
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Sex Crimes and the Vatican
?Marilyn Monroe was having an affair with the President of the United States of America remember. She had attracted the most powerful man in the land.?
Yes, I?m well aware of that, Mike. But, er, what?s it got to do with what we are discussing (i.e., pervy old geezers and their inappropriate appetites for young, teeny, girls). JFK was not old (early 40?s) and neither was Marilyn Monroe young (early 30?s) at the time of their affair. They were only separated by a perfectly innocuous ten-year age gap. So why have you tossed this into the mix?
But on the subject of Marilyn ? this is a woman I have no problem endorsing. Beautiful, charming, adorable, ultra feminine, and boasting a superb knob-stiffening 37-23-36 figure (or there abouts) she was everything today?s skinny, lairy, shapeless, chav birds are not.
?Girls of fourteen usually shag guys usually a bit older than theirselves, which is perfectly natural.?
That sounds a reasonable statement of fact, Mike. Can?t disagree with that.
?Their sex lives are private and it should be no business of anyone else,including the state or you.?
But I can beg to differ on this. Their sex lives are not private. They are (legally) children. Their sex lives are the business of their parents, the state, and my good self as a shareholder and concerned citizen of said state. Every society has to have a shared set of rules that are necessary to maintain the cohesion and order of that society. In our society we deem that fourteen year olds are children ? naive, inexperienced, irresponsible, individuals subject to moods swings, tantrums and fads. Individuals who have little real knowledge or understanding of the world around them. These are not the most ideal type of citizens to take on the mantle of motherhood and to be left in the charge of a small, fragile, precious biological machine ? which is what an unfretted sex life would inevitably lead to. This is all the more pertinent today when life is increasingly frenetic and community spirit has all but vanished. Today?s skanky chav birds are not taught how to cook, clean, and look after bairns. A) Because divi PC fuckers in the public sector want them to be bricklayers, paratroopers and firemen. And B) because their own mothers are probably onetime stupid, feckless, teenage mums who don?t know jack about anything (except whose the front runner on BB) and care even less. The only sage advice such a potential grandmother could offer a fourteen-year-old mum would be the best bus to catch for the Social Security Office. These are just some of the reasons why our society frowns on teenage girls having sex.
But there are other reasons ? like preventing stupid, little, lovelies, who don?t really know their own mind, from being exploited by dirty old geezers intent on sating their pervy lusts on them. Only thing is, nowadays they?re not so lovely ? which makes it all the worse. How depraved can ya' get, eh? Lusting after young girls is one thing ? but lusting after young chav birds is beyond the pale. Then there is the deep-seated primeval rage and revulsion we all feel at the prospect of a dirty old git molesting our nieces, daughters and granddaughters. It?s well out of order; we feel an overarching contempt, disgust and revulsion for the perpetrator. What?s wrong with this fucker? Why is he fiddling with little girls? Can?t he get it on with a proper woman? His he frightened of ?em or what?
?Iam a family man you see. A gentleman of honour.?
I have no doubt you?re a gentlemen of honor, Mike, I therefore take it on trust that you will bin all your teeny films and only shoot proper mature women (with ample tits and asses) in any future productions.
?My partner at the moment is a beautiful woman in her forties by whom I have two beautiful children. I am happy Dibble?
Er, sounds cushty, Mike. I?m pleased for ya?. But then, pray, why have you been going on about nubile teenies ever since you have been posting on here?
Officer Dibble
Yes, I?m well aware of that, Mike. But, er, what?s it got to do with what we are discussing (i.e., pervy old geezers and their inappropriate appetites for young, teeny, girls). JFK was not old (early 40?s) and neither was Marilyn Monroe young (early 30?s) at the time of their affair. They were only separated by a perfectly innocuous ten-year age gap. So why have you tossed this into the mix?
But on the subject of Marilyn ? this is a woman I have no problem endorsing. Beautiful, charming, adorable, ultra feminine, and boasting a superb knob-stiffening 37-23-36 figure (or there abouts) she was everything today?s skinny, lairy, shapeless, chav birds are not.
?Girls of fourteen usually shag guys usually a bit older than theirselves, which is perfectly natural.?
That sounds a reasonable statement of fact, Mike. Can?t disagree with that.
?Their sex lives are private and it should be no business of anyone else,including the state or you.?
But I can beg to differ on this. Their sex lives are not private. They are (legally) children. Their sex lives are the business of their parents, the state, and my good self as a shareholder and concerned citizen of said state. Every society has to have a shared set of rules that are necessary to maintain the cohesion and order of that society. In our society we deem that fourteen year olds are children ? naive, inexperienced, irresponsible, individuals subject to moods swings, tantrums and fads. Individuals who have little real knowledge or understanding of the world around them. These are not the most ideal type of citizens to take on the mantle of motherhood and to be left in the charge of a small, fragile, precious biological machine ? which is what an unfretted sex life would inevitably lead to. This is all the more pertinent today when life is increasingly frenetic and community spirit has all but vanished. Today?s skanky chav birds are not taught how to cook, clean, and look after bairns. A) Because divi PC fuckers in the public sector want them to be bricklayers, paratroopers and firemen. And B) because their own mothers are probably onetime stupid, feckless, teenage mums who don?t know jack about anything (except whose the front runner on BB) and care even less. The only sage advice such a potential grandmother could offer a fourteen-year-old mum would be the best bus to catch for the Social Security Office. These are just some of the reasons why our society frowns on teenage girls having sex.
But there are other reasons ? like preventing stupid, little, lovelies, who don?t really know their own mind, from being exploited by dirty old geezers intent on sating their pervy lusts on them. Only thing is, nowadays they?re not so lovely ? which makes it all the worse. How depraved can ya' get, eh? Lusting after young girls is one thing ? but lusting after young chav birds is beyond the pale. Then there is the deep-seated primeval rage and revulsion we all feel at the prospect of a dirty old git molesting our nieces, daughters and granddaughters. It?s well out of order; we feel an overarching contempt, disgust and revulsion for the perpetrator. What?s wrong with this fucker? Why is he fiddling with little girls? Can?t he get it on with a proper woman? His he frightened of ?em or what?
?Iam a family man you see. A gentleman of honour.?
I have no doubt you?re a gentlemen of honor, Mike, I therefore take it on trust that you will bin all your teeny films and only shoot proper mature women (with ample tits and asses) in any future productions.
?My partner at the moment is a beautiful woman in her forties by whom I have two beautiful children. I am happy Dibble?
Er, sounds cushty, Mike. I?m pleased for ya?. But then, pray, why have you been going on about nubile teenies ever since you have been posting on here?
Officer Dibble
-
Officer Dibble
- Posts: 2372
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Sex Crimes and the Vatican
"A serious and well written post! I take my trousers off to you sir...."
Whoa! Nice one, Keith. You know you can rely on Officer Dibbs...
Officer Dibble
Whoa! Nice one, Keith. You know you can rely on Officer Dibbs...
Officer Dibble
-
eroticartist
- Posts: 2941
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Sex Crimes and the Vatican
Dibble,
I mention Marilyn because although she was seen as a bimbo she was an intelligent woman who used her sexual attraction to get the guy that she wanted and this is an example of feminine intelligence.
Fourteen year olds maybe legally children but they are not and can be sexually mature. You cannot control Nature and what is more important is teaching them about contraception and how to avoid disease. It is because of your attitude that we have the highest teenage pregnancy rate in Europe. The Dutch have the lowest becuase they realise that fourteen year old girls do have sex, in spite of everything, and teach them contraception.
Ask any psychiatrist and he will tell you that paedophiles as such are not sexually attracted to post pubertal girls but desire much younger children.
Incest is of course morally wrong.
I don't have any "teeny"films and all my performers are adults. You seem to be on your high moral horse and have certain ideas about what is acceptable but as a film-maker do what is legal and what I think is acceptable.
As far as I am concerned you are just a hypocritical,mysogynistic patriarch and a control freak. I would like to wire you up to a plesymograph and get a nubile teen to strip in front of you. I can arrange it if you want to accept the challenge!
Mike.
I mention Marilyn because although she was seen as a bimbo she was an intelligent woman who used her sexual attraction to get the guy that she wanted and this is an example of feminine intelligence.
Fourteen year olds maybe legally children but they are not and can be sexually mature. You cannot control Nature and what is more important is teaching them about contraception and how to avoid disease. It is because of your attitude that we have the highest teenage pregnancy rate in Europe. The Dutch have the lowest becuase they realise that fourteen year old girls do have sex, in spite of everything, and teach them contraception.
Ask any psychiatrist and he will tell you that paedophiles as such are not sexually attracted to post pubertal girls but desire much younger children.
Incest is of course morally wrong.
I don't have any "teeny"films and all my performers are adults. You seem to be on your high moral horse and have certain ideas about what is acceptable but as a film-maker do what is legal and what I think is acceptable.
As far as I am concerned you are just a hypocritical,mysogynistic patriarch and a control freak. I would like to wire you up to a plesymograph and get a nubile teen to strip in front of you. I can arrange it if you want to accept the challenge!
Mike.
amazon.com/author/freeman