A picture of pensioners bowling with bombs by graffiti artist Banksy has sold in London for ?102,000, breaking a record for his work.
Bombing Middle England, which is made from acrylic and spray-paint on canvas, reached double its highest estimated price of ?50,000 at Sotheby's.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/6340109.stm
?102,000 for stenciled pictures? And I thought footballers were overpaid!
Money for Nothing?
Re: Money for Nothing?
hmmm good old gets paid load of money in the name of "art" so howabout those 2 twats who got run over by that train as they were just going about bringing joy into others lives by sharing their "art" surely their relatives should get a dirty big payout as well, i mean you cant beat that for suffering for your art.
Re: Money for Nothing?
......and the chicks are free?
-
The Last Word
- Posts: 1644
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Money for Nothing?
Money for trite, overrated twaddle to be precise. He is very fashionable mind.
I know I've sometimes defended modern artists and the like on this forum, but even I think Banksy is a shocking fraud.
I know I've sometimes defended modern artists and the like on this forum, but even I think Banksy is a shocking fraud.
"Let's do it..."
-
eroticartist
- Posts: 2941
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Money for Nothing?
The only thing that could not possible be art is porn!
Mike Freeman.
Mike Freeman.
amazon.com/author/freeman
Re: Money for Nothing?
Totally disagree Mike.
It's difficult to define 'porn' and 'art' - both are subjective terms.
Trevor Watson for example or Robet Maplethorpe, are either artistic or ponorgaphic depending on who you talk to.
It's difficult to define 'porn' and 'art' - both are subjective terms.
Trevor Watson for example or Robet Maplethorpe, are either artistic or ponorgaphic depending on who you talk to.
quis custodiet ipsos custodes