Lying Porn Stars

A place to socialise and share opinions with other members of the BGAFD Community.
Sam Slater
Posts: 11624
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Lying Porn Stars

Post by Sam Slater »

According to this site, BGAFD have KazB down as having done 16 films over 2 years.

If they've been shooting 6 times a week then BGAFD need to pull their finger out and list the other 500 scenes they've done! !laugh!

Hey, good luck to em if they can make money from an article....

Which begs the question......

'Why'd Loaded base a porn article around a couple that's hardly shot any films?

Why not Isabel Ice, Michelle B, Jamie Brooks etc, who've done hundreds? There'd be no exaggerating with those!

[i]I used to spend a lot of time criticizing Islam on here in the noughties - but things are much better now.[/i]
bigAl
Posts: 1068
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Lying Porn Stars

Post by bigAl »

SpankyMonkey,

why not post some pics of yourself and your bird on the Promotions Forum, and see if any producers are prepared to give you some work!
bigAl
Posts: 1068
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Lying Porn Stars

Post by bigAl »

Might I respectfully suggest then that you reflect on the tone of some of your posts, and think more carefully before you openly criticise other people.
Sam Slater
Posts: 11624
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Lying Porn Stars

Post by Sam Slater »

Ooohhh go on Spanky!

Tell you what, I'll go first. Me & my girl are sometimes shallow, but when you're as goodlooking as us, who gives a shit?

[img]http://www.grimmemennesker.dk/data/medi ... Couple.jpg[/img]

[i]I used to spend a lot of time criticizing Islam on here in the noughties - but things are much better now.[/i]
Naomixxx
Posts: 387
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Lying Porn Stars

Post by Naomixxx »

Lol Sam!

Naomi x
Ned
Posts: 835
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Lying Porn Stars

Post by Ned »

You mean men actually get paid? You see so many posts on here which say something like - "There's no pay, no expenses but you get to watch a real life girl get naked and you can have a have a wank on her. And you might get a sandwich after. You lucky people!"

!wink!
KazB
Posts: 1199
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Lying Porn Stars

Post by KazB »

Laughing my ass off having just seen this thread! !grin!

I wasn't aware that the Loaded article had gone to press. The journalist in question printed the story first in More magazine which was pretty riddled with errors & half truths. I was merely amused by this as I conclude that only imbeciles believe everything they read in the press but JJ was less than impressed. We therefore sent a load of changes over to the journalist who promised (for what it's worth) to amend the article before it went into the Sport....

Of course this didn't happen so J asked them to pull the article before it went into Loaded - but hey that was never going to happen so just to set the record straight for you.....

We don't shoot 5 or 6 films a week! Most of my work has been tv work and modelling and now I'm working on my own projects a lot more. You can see a summary here

The shoot mentioned was for One eyed jack. The first time of course we didn't get paid - that would be ridiculous! We'd been moving house and were both shattered but Terry shoots REAL couples so is well used to guys getting a flop-on and he generously arranged another date with us. I think it fair to say that quite a few studs have had problems with wood at some point in their lives and especially their first ever shoot!

Spankymonkey you are 100% accurate in labelling me a publicity seeker although I prefer to call it self promotion myself. A tool which is key to any customer/fan based business.

I also quite like the fact that the articles are helping to change public perspective, if only in a very small way. Whilst the articles may be exaggerated or innacurate in places - I hasten to add, the articles were pro-porn which I believe not only normalises it for people who haven't been exposed to very much porn, but makes it more socially acceptable. With this in mind I think the media can play a very useful role in changing attitudes and I see this as a very positive thing.


Any suspected exaggeration is not due to a lack of a real story, in fact the magazines are very tightly controlled on what they can and can't say and we were told that much of it would be deemed to racy for their readership. They were unable to even print topless pics in some of the women's magazines!

The girls mentioned by Sam of course would make fantastic interview material I agree! However the story was initially commissioned for a popular Women's magaine. They wanted a story which would appeal to their target audience - which I believe is females aged 18-25 and they felt the best way to do this would be to interview people that their readership could relate to somewhat. Whereas I imagine they felt that the readership would find it harder to relate to the likes of top professional bg stars who shoot tons of scenes each month.

I hope this has answered some of your questions and also quashed some of your angst Spanky hun.

Personal thoughts aside - it seems the article has incited a reaction so I guess you could say the journo's done her job!



PS: If anyone can scan me over a copy of said article that would be mostly appreciated :)

Cum spray your spunk over my new HARDCORE site!

<http://www.kazbxxx.com/kazb>


Promoters >> britsexcash.com
Locked