interesting !

A read-only and searchable archive of posts made to the BGAFD forum from 11/08/2000 to 14/03/2003.
Locked
marcusallen

interesting !

Post by marcusallen »

The response to my two threads called "What You Prefer" parts 1 and two was roughly about the same in numbers. How many were duplicates, only the Awesome Trio would know.

What is of interest to me is of course, the results and the lack of response by regular posters who always have an opinion on everything including the weather.
Is it a fear of commitment?
Revealing one's desires/needs/preferences?
Fear of adverse comment on one's choice?
Or something else.

Makes me wonder.
magoo

Re: interesting !

Post by magoo »

Well I replied Marcus you grumpy old goat! What were the results? I would hope good old fashioned vaginal sex was the winner but I feel that the USA domination of the industry may mean otherwise. Not that I am against anal or oral. Its just that UK producers feel forced to ape the likes of Rob Black, Anabolic etc. Hence no variety. The industry now dictates what the punter should like and anyone with different tastes has to look to older material.

Call me old fashioned but I like girls vaginas. With USA films you get 30 seconds of vaginal followed by 30 minutes of anal and tedious blow job footage. I get bored with looking at gaping anuses (or is the plural ani LOL) and the remnants of what they had for dinner the day before.
marcusallen

Re: interesting !

Post by marcusallen »

Hi Magoo,
The Awesome Trio have the results - hence, completely unbiased in case some cynics may think otherwise.
jj

Re: interesting !

Post by jj »

Not in my case, Marcus.
I simply felt that the question was unanswerable in terms of one selection. I like/dislike all three, depending on mood/state of the Pound/last night's football results etc etc.
And, of course, upon who's participating.
Jay

Re: interesting ! nah its FUNNY

Post by Jay »

a = anal

b = blowjob

and

c = cu... pussy


did u mean to put them in that order or is it luck :o)
jj

Re: interesting ! nah its FUNNY

Post by jj »

Well spotted.
And the plural of 'anus' is, since we are speaking English (well, some of us, anyway.....), 'anuses'.
What the Latin plural is depends on whether it's first or fifth declension: will ask the Missus for a definitive ruling later.
magoo

Re: interesting ! nah its FUNNY

Post by magoo »

I knew that JJ thanks hence the "LOL". Now after you have asked the missus I suggest you take yourself to a quiet room and have a word with yourself about your dictionary fetish. This persistent swotiness is becoming dreary.

Did you want to add to the debate or would you prefer to just show off your use of English?

Oh and while your on, what was your answer to Mr Allens little survey? Or is that classified information ie Top Secret?

Sorry JJ, I didnt mean to be nasty. I must sleep. I love your swotty stuff really!
jj

Re: interesting ! nah its FUNNY

Post by jj »

1) I only really use the dictionary to look up naughty bread-related words.
2) I was just showing off, as usual.
3) And I think I already explained the reasons why I didn't answer Marcus' question at all.
Pay attention at the back !!!!
buttsie

Re: interesting !

Post by buttsie »

General apathy towards polls I'd say.

Maybe in the future you should allow comment as long as the person casting their vote comes to a choice so the poll can be concluded.Just like elections one choice.

cheers
B...OZ Purring Beautifully
jj

Re: interesting !

Post by jj »

The trouble with such polls is they make it easy to analyse the data statistically, but are largely meaningless because there is no room for shading of opinions.
They are dependent entirely on the phrasing of the question: a good pollster can so phrase any question as to get the required response. The court-room 'yes' or 'no' is another example of such questioning being designed to elicit the required response and no other.
'There are lies, damnned lies, and statistics'...
Locked