poll

A read-only and searchable archive of posts made to the BGAFD forum from 11/08/2000 to 14/03/2003.
monkeyman

Re: jj

Post by monkeyman »

Can't see much point as most people reply to stuff on here pretty quick. At least with a forum you don't have to piss around trying to figure out who the fuck is talking to who and what about. A forum is more direct and to the point. So I too have... 'magooed'. But nobody can stop you if you are adamant about it.
buttsie

Re: no thank you I'm quite happy with the status q

Post by buttsie »

B because I like the present format which allows considered responses with no time limits

Personally for chat I talk to friends face to face,nothing personal

cheers
B...OZ
Froglin

Re: poll

Post by Froglin »


I don't see any harm in a test run,
but I do prefer the forum atmosphere
to a chat room.

my answer is A(yes)
jj

Re: no thank you I'm quite happy with the status q

Post by jj »

Hadn't thought about the time-factor.....
...and S Quo? terrible band. Except for Caroline/Gerdundula etc, anything written b4 about 1972.
Froglin

Re: poll

Post by Froglin »

i just want more piss.
will achat room help
increase piss talk?
jj

Re: poll

Post by jj »

...piss-taking, yes: piss-talk? Probably not.
buttsie

Re: sacriledge

Post by buttsie »

You had a bad trip just around 1972 I take it!

How could you knock a band that sang such great,obviously porn songs as Down Down,Roll Over Lay Down,Rain & Again and Again.
Guess what,all written after 1972.Good Acid,must have been.

Just think if we were in the chatroom now we could be abusing the shit out of each other in a good natured way.

cheers
B...OZ You Know It Makes Sense
buttsie

Re: poll

Post by buttsie »

Piss taking is that an addiction?
Too inject or swallow?

I think i might be an addict lol

cheers
B...OZ
jj

Re: sacriledge

Post by jj »

buttsie wrote:
> Just think if we were in the chatroom now we could be abusing
> the shit out of each other in a good natured way.
......As opposed to......?
Locked