robstonefilms.com

[Arnold Layne]

You'll either get it or you won't

There it is

[WigBilly]

Well I get it...but why does there always have to be so much damned spitting?? !puke!

[jj]

Because it's 'edgy' and hip.
Certainly not because it's uncouth, unhygienic and most heinously, unerotic....

[jj]

I'm honoured a) that he read my post, and b) that he saw fit to quote me
[albeit without the courtesy of asking my blessing] on his site.

I scored quite highly on his analysis, but if he doesn't like the 'racist' tag
he ought to be a bit clearer in future about precisely who he's having a go
at- and let's face it, we're neither believers in adhering to strict accuracy
when cudgeling our favourite targets :- )

[jj]

What's a 'stute'? [img]http://bgafd.co.uk/forum/smileys/grin.gif[/img]

[Deuce Bigolo]

mart wrote:

> What's he disgruntled about?
> He's just a shock-jock.
> Remember the Canadian woman who came on here some months
> back... starting out to be a real bitch....why? Just to get
> notorious.
> Never seen his films, don't want to from some
> descriptions...theres a lot more out there for free.
>
> Mart

As i'm not part of the industry how would I l know what he's disgruntled about Mart

My comments merely refer to the topics he's posted on his site

How you can pass judgement on something you've never seen is beyond me

Basing an opinion on someone elses view is foolhardy at best but then if you entered with a closed mind to start with I guess your right in not viewing it

No I don't recall the canadian bird as I've only just come back online but what Industry producer isn't marketing their product in one way or another to get noticed

[Deuce Bigolo]

All my knowledge comes from that thing between my ears
based on nothing more than accrued information over the years

No guarantees on accuracy but it gives others some work to do in disproving me so I feel OK

A good example would be would be my totally unsubstantiated view that,

Porn at the extreme end is what those that are seeking to destroy porn use first & foremost in their arguments against the industry

The more extreme the less likely that porn will ever be fully accepted by society

The amount of money generated by Porn says its use is widespread but bugger all people will readily admit to using it regularly which is probably going to be the status quo for quite a while

[Arnold Layne]

I personally don't think his films are that extreme, I'm sure we've all seen worse from Europe and even the USA, I know I have, if porn is more extreme then it won't be accepted by society? so it's up to who to say what the limit to a fetish is? The BBFC allow a woman to piss in an R18 video as long as it's a non sexual context, they still don't allow squirting as they believe it to be peeing, so it shows the powers that be haven't had much pussy then, as long as someone isn't a minor and consenting I see no problem with it, look at the "Expermental" thread, maybe some girls like getting spat on, there definitley is a lot of people who like to watch it, and I know for a fact from speaking to Rob personally he isn't no racist, or ego maniac, more people should get up and say what they think without fear of some little middle class silver spoon lefty fag saying you can;t do that becaue I say, I mean come on British porn is mostly shit, save for a few quality studios really putting effort into their product like **********, Harmony, Killergram/Pornostatic, to name but most, is their anyone who actually buys Rude Britannia films? If your reading Rob !drink! that's a least a case of diet coke you owe me !grin!