Trumpton wrote:
> It is interesting to note that as a public forum the number of
> regular posters is about two dozen - a remarkably small number.
> Why is this the case?
Because it's shite.
Get past the chavstaion posts, the pissing contests between forumites, the forumites who don't speak English and the 'best sitar in a 60's top forty record type posts, and franlkly there aint much.
The self-appointed moral guardians.
Re: The self-appointed moral guardians.
quis custodiet ipsos custodes
-
Deuce Bigolo
- Posts: 9910
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: The self-appointed moral guardians.
Trumpton wrote:
> There are a group of people on this forum who have arrogantly
> set themselves up as some sort of self-appointed moral
> guardians. They spend their entire time patrolling these
> forums issuing warnings and reprimands to posters who do not
> happen to agree with their political agenda!
Every forum has their dominant forumites
The secrets to find the right one for you
I tried about a hundred before I found this one
>
> These self-appointed moral guardians are perfectly willing and
> able to dictate, pontificate and occasionally intimidate those
> who are a), new and innocent to this forum, and b), those who
> they disagree with.
If it were an issue Trumpton the Mods would have stepped in as they have regularly done in years gone by.As they have often reminded us forumites..."This is THEIR dictatorship"
I very much doubt any lurkers or newbies are shaking in their shoes as they post a topic on this forum
>
> It is interesting to note that as a public forum the number of
> regular posters is about two dozen - a remarkably small number.
> Why is this the case? It will be argued that many potential
> posters have been frigthened off by the bully-boy tactics of
> the self-appointed moral guardians?
>
>
Given as few as 60 people per day visit the o/t forum 2 dozen sounds like a huge number
> There are a group of people on this forum who have arrogantly
> set themselves up as some sort of self-appointed moral
> guardians. They spend their entire time patrolling these
> forums issuing warnings and reprimands to posters who do not
> happen to agree with their political agenda!
Every forum has their dominant forumites
The secrets to find the right one for you
I tried about a hundred before I found this one
>
> These self-appointed moral guardians are perfectly willing and
> able to dictate, pontificate and occasionally intimidate those
> who are a), new and innocent to this forum, and b), those who
> they disagree with.
If it were an issue Trumpton the Mods would have stepped in as they have regularly done in years gone by.As they have often reminded us forumites..."This is THEIR dictatorship"
I very much doubt any lurkers or newbies are shaking in their shoes as they post a topic on this forum
>
> It is interesting to note that as a public forum the number of
> regular posters is about two dozen - a remarkably small number.
> Why is this the case? It will be argued that many potential
> posters have been frigthened off by the bully-boy tactics of
> the self-appointed moral guardians?
>
>
Given as few as 60 people per day visit the o/t forum 2 dozen sounds like a huge number
Re: The self-appointed moral guardians.
...also any of the South American juntas; all slightly to the right of Adolf
[and indeed often run by erstwhile henchmen of that same individual],
and hardly exemplars of democratic free speech.
[and indeed often run by erstwhile henchmen of that same individual],
and hardly exemplars of democratic free speech.
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."
Re: The self-appointed moral guardians.
For my money the bully-boys on this forum are the ranters who launch posts that read like Daily Mail editorials.
Mart
Mart
Re: The self-appointed moral guardians.
Isn't it a bit un-PC to assume that bullies all come from one side of the
political spectrum?
political spectrum?
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."
Re: The self-appointed moral guardians.
Perhaps by this thread; but overall such bullying as there is here seems
to me to politically catholic.
to me to politically catholic.
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."
Re: The self-appointed moral guardians.
I agree with your post here triple M.
It's interesting that when I've posted subjects which are couched as questions some significant forumites jump all over it and start reeling off accusations!
With my thread about poverty I stated that there was sufficient welfare provision for those in pecuniary need. However the self-appointed moral guardians chose to ignore that point. I never got a chance to put my next point concerning the perceived difference between the poor and poverty because I had to defend myself against the charge of being a fascist!
It's interesting that when I've posted subjects which are couched as questions some significant forumites jump all over it and start reeling off accusations!
With my thread about poverty I stated that there was sufficient welfare provision for those in pecuniary need. However the self-appointed moral guardians chose to ignore that point. I never got a chance to put my next point concerning the perceived difference between the poor and poverty because I had to defend myself against the charge of being a fascist!