Fining the johns.

[Trumpton]

warren zevon rip wrote:
>
> He started a "send WZR to Coventry" thread, spewing out the
> abuse that I was quick enough to cut and paste, as proof of his
> true nature. It was virtually identical to Keith's "send WZR to
> Coventry" thread, and both were quickly deleted. I would have
> preferred them to both stand as evidence of his unprovoked
> attack on a fellow forumite.

Ah, I see.
>
> Since he was outed by Dibble and myself as Keith under another
> username, "Giles" seems to have shut up.

That would explain a lot.
>
> I would be interested to know, why "Giles" was not officially
> (or even unofficially - cheers guys!) reprimanded for his abuse
> to me in the same way as "Keith" was for his abuse to Red. I
> know he did not swear, but as you can see from my sig. he was
> being incredibly intimidatory. Fair enough, WZR can always take
> it, but then so could Red.

Is it because you are not a lady?

[Trumpton]

warren zevon rip wrote:

> Trumpton wrote:
>
> > Is it because you are not a lady?
>
> How do you know I am not a lady?

Are you a lady?
>
> And, seriously, it does piss me off, that someone can abuse the
> "only one username rule" and aggressvely and rather
> pathetically abuse me (btw my old sig. has been banned -
> despite being a verbatim quote form the Siberian reprobate) and
> get no warning.

I noticed that.
>
> Whereas one post against Red, who needed no protection
> whatsoever, being a zillion times as well informed as
> KeithGiles, and the might of Admin descended. Either sexist or
> WZRist!

Mmmm, strange.

[Jacques]

Now WZR I thought you were a man of books and knowledge and should know that "All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others."

[Sam Slater]

Lol...Giles will be happy you're backing him up Keith.