Open question to BBFC mandarins and the forum.

[c.j.jaxxon]

I figure if they are gay then we wood see some gay material on these forums to which I haven't. Yet though that wouldn't be right at all to have a secret agenda. If word gets out that they do, I figure they'll get their come-uppins one day!

[mrmcfister]

There is a gay wood by a lay by near the M5.Always the cars are empty.The woods next door are frequented by business types and lorry drivers getting rid of their urges.Plod doesn't care because theres no complaints.All a bit sordid really but perhaps a bit less smelly than the lavs....

[jimslip]

I expect that the BBFC would argue that the sodomy of boys is part of gay culture and stretches back to Ancient Greek times. In the same way, it should be OK to release a video for Muslim men on "59 Ways to Beat Your Wife", a lovers guide; or "How To Do an Honour Killing.....and get away with it!"

[Trumpton]

mrmcfister wrote:

> There is a gay wood by a lay by near the M5.Always the cars
> are empty.The woods next door are frequented by business types
> and lorry drivers getting rid of their urges.

So what? Would this have got a mentioned if it had been hetrosexuals at 'play'?

> Plod doesn't care because theres no complaints.

A sensible policy.

> All a bit sordid really

Just as "sordid" as straight 'dogging' areas, carparks, etc?

> but perhaps a bit less smelly than the lavs....

True.

[mrmcfister]

Trumpton,
Call me old fashioned but I find dogging a bit sordid too...

[Jacques]

There has always and will always be double standards when it comes to censorship.

[Trumpton]

mrmcfister wrote:

> Trumpton,
> Call me old fashioned but I find dogging a bit sordid too...

Especially these days with the extremely high rates of STI's and HIV/Aids.

[Trumpton]

Jacques wrote:

> There has always and will always be double standards when it
> comes to censorship.

There shouldn't be! Equality and all that means.