Rottweilers

[steve56]

Dangerous dogs

[bristolian]

Only owned by macho chav twats who shouldn't have kids in the first place imo.

[b217bravo]

There is absolutely no reason why a member of the public should want to/ be allowed to own/keep these dogs, same goes for others such as Bull Mastiffs, Doberman Pinschers, Staffordshire Bulls etc. all are tempremental & likely to revert to their natural instincts for no apparent reason.
Nobody, not even those close to them, can consider themselves immune from possible attack with the resultant horrendous & sometimes fatal consequences.
As Bristolian wrote they are invariably kept by macho types for no other reason than a percieved status symbol.
geoff (b217bravo(

[Trumpton]

Should be banned.

[Sam Slater]

I'm sure the owners learn to love them and think they know their own dogs temperament, but when you've been bred, specifically to fight/be aggressive/show no fear, then no owner can be 100% sure of what's going to happen when they're not around.

Who wants an uglified dog, that costs more a week to feed than your grandmother + two kids, and weighs over 10 stone, making it impossible to control if they get angry?

Whatever happened to the collies, labradors & alsatians? Ok, they can attack, but they can't overpower you physically.

[Trumpton]

The scum who have dangerous dogs have them because they have an "image" to maintain, that of a "hard geezer", when in fact they are cretinious plies of vermins vomit with tiny shrivelled cocks.

[steve56]

Boxer dogs are rough too

[Trumpton]

I agree with Sir here.