Worst than pornographers

[colonel]

What did a life coach do to you then?

[leobloom]

Never had one Colonel, just when I hear them talk it makes me cringe.

[one eyed jack]

Hellblazer wrote:

- Anyone who earns more than ?50,000 p.a. - you've worked hard to get there but by this point, how hard you work is inversely proportional to your salary.

Are you kidding???? You need to earn more than 50k living in London in London to have some kind of life style. Hence why they are trying to price everyone out and have the rich just live in London.

Sometimes i dont think Britain knows if its capitalist or socialist or whether we are just socialists and the tax man is the capitalist.

[Mike_CFC]

Richard Bacon is a fine one to preach what's 'wrong and right'.

Was'nt he once caught doing the 'Bolivian marching powder' with a couple of ladies of lesuire?,allegedly.

The words glass houses and stones spring to mind.Then again you have to be a self-rightous cunt to work for the BBC.

[eroticartist]

Hellblazer,
By saying "worst than pornographers" you are implying that pornographers are bad per se. At the end of your list you mention capitalism. Capitalism is merely the ethos of "buy cheap, sell dear" to you the consumer in order to exploit your needs and also by advertising to create demand for things that you do not really need but which they need you to buy, in order to keep up with the Jones's, in order to sustain growth.

Capitalism is really a game with no physical reality that depends on all of us sticking to the rules. I say that it has had its day and merely creates misery,relative poverty and finally war to perpetuate itself and power for those that organise the game.

There are other economic systems and it is about time we got rid of capitalism before another World War occurs to prop up the system again.
Freeman.

[Mike_CFC]

Nothing wrong with pornographers imo.They're doing a job,they do it well and they get paid for it to boot.

You've got to be a right namby pamby Guardian reading leftie to oppose pornography,providing the people involved are all of legal age i can't see anything wrong with it.

All pornstars would'nt be stupid enough to break rules either,that does not include Marino and his cronies shagging on the open road,which i think is absoultely quality !thumbsup! !drink!

[ATS]

Mike_CFC wrote:

> Richard Bacon is a fine one to preach what's 'wrong and right'.
>
> Was'nt he once caught doing the 'Bolivian marching powder' with
> a couple of ladies of lesuire?,allegedly.
>
> The words glass houses and stones spring to mind.Then again you
> have to be a self-rightous cunt to work for the BBC.
>
>

Just read that Bacon got married yesterday and spent
?40,000 on his wedding reception - see the drugs do work

[leobloom]

what gets me is these guardian readers and journos have probably seen some porn in there time, nothing wrong with porn imo, I don't think hellblazer has trying to say there was summut wrong with it in the first place.

[Mike_CFC]

leobloom wrote:

> what gets me is these guardian readers and journos have
> probably seen some porn in there time, nothing wrong with porn
> imo, I don't think hellblazer has trying to say there was
> summut wrong with it in the first place.
>
>
The irony is it's more than likely the Guardian readers that would get a kick out of proper filth like underage porn and anything to do with animals and skat,a 110% no,no for decent folk like my goodself and the majority of this world.

What makes me mad is these MP's,shock jocks like Richard Bacon and High Court judges that pass judgement,yet they probably watch porn themselves.

[Lizard]

"What makes me mad is these MP's,shock jocks like Richard Bacon "

Christ on toast! what makes Bacon a shock jock? he's wprking for the establishment now. thats the only shock, actually I think he's a good presenter overall..