Anybody see this on Sunday?
Also if you look at sue simmonds on gentlemans relish site you will see a
nice clip of sue getting her boobs out in her garden
?180 Hand Job
Re: ?180 Hand Job
Used to pay ?20 in the 70s /80s thought that was a lot then.
Re: ?180 Hand Job
Alice In Blunderland wrote:
> You had a gap which means it will not load so I have done a
> clickable version, 180 quid for a wank- she is a former page 3
> girl from years back not Eva Longoria.
>
>
> http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/0203_page3girl.shtml
Sorry for being a bit of a twunt. Cheers for your help
> You had a gap which means it will not load so I have done a
> clickable version, 180 quid for a wank- she is a former page 3
> girl from years back not Eva Longoria.
>
>
> http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/0203_page3girl.shtml
Sorry for being a bit of a twunt. Cheers for your help
Re: ?180 Hand Job
steve56 wrote:
> Used to pay ?20 in the 70s /80s thought that was a lot then.
Before the greed is good days Steve
> Used to pay ?20 in the 70s /80s thought that was a lot then.
Before the greed is good days Steve
Re: ?180 Hand Job
Yep.ATS wrote:
> steve56 wrote:
>
> > Used to pay ?20 in the 70s /80s thought that was a lot then.
>
> Before the greed is good days Steve
> steve56 wrote:
>
> > Used to pay ?20 in the 70s /80s thought that was a lot then.
>
> Before the greed is good days Steve
Re: ?180 Hand Job
Blimey! It's a case of more money than sense.
Re: ?180 Hand Job
perhaps he needed it badly
Re: ?180 Hand Job
They make it seem so seedy, shes obviously a classy enough lady and has done well for herself, and shes NOT providing a full service only HR at the end, I really dont like the tone of this story.
And you just know the Suns guy was itching for that Hand relief too.
Re: ?180 Hand Job
There's a really snide tone to that article, typical NOTW journalism.
Like no tabloid reporters have ever hired hookers....
Like no tabloid reporters have ever hired hookers....