?180 Hand Job

A place to socialise and share opinions with other members of the BGAFD Community.
colonel
Posts: 4156
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: ?180 Hand Job

Post by colonel »

No, the dogs had no cash on them.

*confused*
ATS
Posts: 1069
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: ?180 Hand Job

Post by ATS »

steve56 wrote:

> Did she charge them?[The Nurse]?

Course she did.......... she was a charge nurse!!
steve56
Posts: 13579
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: ?180 Hand Job

Post by steve56 »

Jimmy Tarbuck 1975.
ATS
Posts: 1069
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: ?180 Hand Job

Post by ATS »

steve56 wrote:

Jimmy Tarbuck sunday night at the lndon palladium 1966

Incidentally Steve it is claimed that sunday nights biggest audience was
9.7m in April 64 hosted by Brucie. Featured Frank Ifield, the bachelors and
comedy giants hope and keen. Whatever happened to them I wonder?
JonathanWilson
Posts: 64
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: ?180 Hand Job

Post by JonathanWilson »

The funny things is the NOTW reporters must spend most of their time on adult work scanning the site for people they know just so they can write such articles.

They have also given Sue a huge amount of free publicity thanks to that article so she'll probably make more money now than she would have otherwise.

One interesting point though is they show her "promtional vid" with the notw logo emblazed on it... errrrm sorry but thats copyright infringment unless the person who took it has allowed them to use it/they've paid for it!

Which they probably did so more cash to Sue.... the canny lass, lol.

The only difference between erotic art and porn is how much you can charge for it... 3.99 a mag its porn; 399 a print, its art!

If you hang it on a wall... would the Rev. faint or comment on it; if the former its Porn :-P

www.SomethingErotic.com
Kitt
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: ?180 Hand Job

Post by Kitt »

One interesting point though is they show her "promtional vid" with the notw logo emblazed on it... errrrm sorry but thats copyright infringment unless the person who took it has allowed them to use it/they've paid for it!



Fantastic point............I hope so much that Sue litigates ............The NOTW think that any model and actress in fact anyone is fair game....They also think they cant afford or wouldnt dare to have a go back...........Sue from what Ive gleened doesnt look short of a quid or 3 .I dont know if Sue sees this forum , but I really hope she does one over on them...

Kitt
Locked