42 days detention

A place to socialise and share opinions with other members of the BGAFD Community.
Locked
b217bravo
Posts: 379
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

42 days detention

Post by b217bravo »

Well Gordo won but apparently only after offering bribes & sweeteners to rebels & other parties.

Is this truly how the democratic process should work? surely if you can't win the vote with the power of your argument you lose any credability

It appears that the whole exercise has been simply one of saving (Brown's) face but with the size of the rebellion & closeness of the vote the government will be hard pressed to present this as a convincing victory

b217bravo

JonnyHungwell
Posts: 1230
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: 42 days detention

Post by JonnyHungwell »

Could well be overturned in the Lords. Don't see the need to hold anyone for 28 days, let alone 42 - for any crime. With the police we're saddled with, the chances of them abusing this is quite high. If the need for this amount of time is so necessary in the UK, why isn't it the same in other countries? Very Police State like.
dynatech
Posts: 644
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: 42 days detention

Post by dynatech »

Farewell Liberty!

Let's hope Douglas Hurd was right last week on Question Time & the Lords make themselves even more popular with this government....

They're locking them up today, they're throwing away the key...I wonder who it be tomorrow, you or me?
JonathanWilson
Posts: 64
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: 42 days detention

Post by JonathanWilson »

It will obviously be defeated/returned by the lords (what a sad day for politics that nu-labia have almost destroyed this stop gap against bad knee-jerk legislation)

I wonder if broon will use the parliment act (I think it is) to force this through when its defeated in the lords... just like b'lyer used it to force the hunting act through.

What a sorry state of affairs that this country is now/seems more oppresive and restrictive against free speach and individual rights than that of the the old USSR and nearly as bad as most islamic countries of today.

Not that the cuntservatives will be much better as theres no way they will repeal any bad legislation that gives them a position of power despite their vocalising their oposition to it while not in power... heck bet maggie wished she;d had this much power!!!!(1)

Jon Xx

(1) although I do believe that in the long run "thaterisum" did a lot of good for this country after the abismal state of the uk in the 60's-70's with the 3 day week, strangle hold by the unions, and the winter of discontent.

The only difference between erotic art and porn is how much you can charge for it... 3.99 a mag its porn; 399 a print, its art!

If you hang it on a wall... would the Rev. faint or comment on it; if the former its Porn :-P

www.SomethingErotic.com
randyandy
Posts: 2480
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: 42 days detention

Post by randyandy »

JonathanWilson wrote:

> What a sorry state of affairs that this country is now/seems
> more oppresive and restrictive against free speach and
> individual rights than that of the the old USSR and nearly as
> bad as most islamic countries of today.
>
Classic complete bollocks but still a classic.

randyandy
Posts: 2480
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: 42 days detention

Post by randyandy »

b217bravo wrote:

> Well Gordo won but apparently only after offering bribes &
> sweeteners to rebels & other parties.
>
> Is this truly how the democratic process should work?

In a word NO

>surely if you can't win the vote with the power of your argument you lose
>any credability

You should but unfortunately as far as Politics goes (in terms of the politician mindset) the only thing that will count is that it was a win.

> It appears that the whole exercise has been simply one of
> saving (Brown's) face but with the size of the rebellion &
> closeness of the vote the government will be hard pressed to
> present this as a convincing victory

I don't think anyone will be saying it was a convincing victory just that it was a victory. I also suspect it will only get mentioned IF a case rises or opposition use it at PMQ's.

The Lords will stop it and Brown will say the other place has chosen against the political will of the nation.

Locked