Discrimination

[Stewie_McGriffin]

I just need to check I've got this right...

Inflation is running (officially) at 4% (but in real terms is much much more)

Crime is increasing exponentially

Brown is blaming high fuel prices on 'Global pressure' when he takes about 70p a litre in tax on unleaded fuel, about 80p a litre on diesel

Businesses are going to the wall as a result of the above

Internationally we have a dictator in Zimbabwe but we won't do anything more than write a stern letter to stop it (his country doesn't have oil you see)

Public sector pay is a joke

Multinational companies are, frankly, taking the piss out of our lax tax systems

And the government decides that the most important thing right now is to bring in nonsensical crap like this. Its just as well I used my vote wisely and didn't vote for Brown and his cronies....oh....wait....none of us did....

And one more thing - she's brought this in to balance the workplace. If I'm not mistaken, the country is imbalanced - white males/females have the majority in terms of population - has anybody in Whitehall considered the fact that workplaces are imbalanced because of this??? Or that maybe that women or ethnic minorities simply didn't apply for jobs because they didn't want that particular job?

[Pervert]

If he were a dictactor, wouldn't he have made sure his candidate would have at least shown up well at Henley? Kim Jong Il is a dictator; Mugabe is a dictator. You and others may think Brown is a dick, but you will get the chance to vote him out in two years at the most. I'm sure there are billions worldwide who would love the same opportunity with their leaders.

[Pervert]

Really? Well, I don't know Gordon at all, so I am in no position to judge. But I doubt very much if he, David Cameron or Nick Clegg would be willing to do such a thing. Sounds more like the kind of thing your mates in the BNP might be into.

[Sam Slater]

Dear oh dear, alice....

Wazza using my PC to post, then I'm taking his orders, you burning yourself alive and now I need to grow some gonads......whatever next eh?

Tell you what, can you remember the forumite who posted on here a while back, telling us about his testicular cancer? Why not ask him why he's bothering to live eh? You blockhead; you dolt; you imbecile! According to you, every guy that chooses life over his bollocks is some lilly-livered lefty that probably needed to grow a pair anyway? You ignoramus; you foolish dunderhead; you halfwitted oaf!

To show, categorically, what a dullard you are, alice, I'd like to point you to how this debate of ours began: You, alice, my numskulled jackass, started by complaining that there wasn't enough awareness and media attention towards testicular cancer; you are finishing this debate by declaring life without testes is a life not worth preserving! Are you by any chance on some sick, naziesque mission to have more men be aware of this cancer so they have more opportunity to jump into fires, toss themselves in front of trains or go by way of the rope?

If life isn't worth the balls you were born with, why do you want more awareness? In your world, wouldn't it be better to not know about testicular cancer and live on, balls 'n' all, in blissful ignorance? I just can't work out why you'd care if suicide was the inevitable, and preferable, in your eyes, outcome.

Is this malevolence? Is this malicious, vindictive intent to see mass suicides and an abnormal, mad craving to smell burning flesh? Or, is this just the ramblings of a goose-headed witling who's managed to confuse himself in the attempt to defend a stupid, indefensible position?

[Trumpton]

Alice In Blunderland wrote:

> No the gay community spokespeople would be up in arms that any
> straight people would be allowed to celebrate their sexuality
> and would point to it as offensive to gays.

Visiting this forum is one way we straight people celebrate our sexuality, and I'm sure that gay people don't find this 'offensive'.