Babe Station, Bang Babes.

stripeysydney · Post by **stripeysydney** » Tue Jul 01, 2008 8:30 am

Now that I've got your attention, I've a question; have anyone of you that watch all this type of bollocks have/know a girl/friend?
I'm just curious..

vostok 1 · Post by **vostok 1** » Tue Jul 01, 2008 8:40 am

Does Shelly Louise count?

vostok 1 · Post by **vostok 1** » Tue Jul 01, 2008 8:53 am

stripeysydney:

You have ed-u-macakted all of us "Babe Show" Fans to the virtues of wikipedia, is the following link the motivation behind your curiosity?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tough_love

michaeldon1 · Post by **michaeldon1** » Tue Jul 01, 2008 9:11 am

How do you know it's "Bollocks" unless you watch?????

vostok 1 · Post by **vostok 1** » Tue Jul 01, 2008 9:22 am

I understand Jaques took the time to create the "Babespotting" jpeg in the hope of waking us up from our mind numbing, spirit crushing existance, but your fears were correct: the sentiment was lost due to the references about "vimto" and "crisps" that caused confusion... Those of us born after 1985 have no idea about such things, Redbull and Pringles are the staple diet of our generation.

However, YOU CAN FREE US!

Simply describe in depth and detail how life could be like yours as mentioned in this post:

http://bgafd.co.uk/forum/read.php?f=3&i ... ply_191319

That could very well encourage us to stop wanking off to porn and "Babe shows" and live a life just like yours with a "Real Girl."

speedybert · Post by **speedybert** » Tue Jul 01, 2008 9:56 am

stripeysydney wrote:

> Now that I've got your attention, I've a question; have anyone
> of you that watch all this type of bollocks have/know a
> girl/friend?
> I'm just curious..

Do you watch porn?If you do does that preclude you from having a boyfriend/girlfriend/husband/wife.

I don't think so.

Does it matter if I or anyone else on this forum fancy one off the wrist every now and then,either through a porn vid or through a babe on the telly?

At least we are happy to admit our vices!wink!

vostok 1 · Post by **vostok 1** » Wed Jul 02, 2008 1:48 pm

Is your questioning an instance of what might be called the higher dismissiveness?

For example: asking the question ?Why do you watch Babe show bollocks? I have a real Girl and you don?t.?

But I still believe your question is one of ?tough love? used in a way that allows Babe show fans to see their own social and emotional inadequacies.

But we are no longer in denial.
We realise that this can be a difficult concept for us to recognise in ourselves, but thanks to you, ((((hugs stripeysydney)))) we have jumped over a major barrier en-route to changing our behaviour.

However, we still need your help!

There is still the risk of ?denial of denial? which involves thoughts, actions and behaviour which bolster the confidence that nothing needs to be changed in one?s personal behaviour.
This happened to me this morning when I called the delicious Fernanda Ferrari on ?Early Bird? channel 912:

[img]http://i304.photobucket.com/albums/nn188/rdm5150/07.jpg[/img]

I called her and spoke about you... She told me to ignore you because ?He sounds like he is in denial himself.?

She went on to say that ?stripeysydney?s form of denial typically overlaps with all of the other forms of denial, but involves more self-delusion since stripeysydney?s bgafd posts show indifference and disregard by actively dismissing and rejecting.?

She suggested that you read ?The Men They Will Become? by Eli H. Newberger, M.D.

We still need your help stripeysydney....
But are you in denial?
To quote you: ?I?m just curious..?

Shelley Louise · Post by **Shelley Louise** » Wed Jul 02, 2008 3:32 pm

vostok 1 wrote:

> Does Shelly Louise count?

Count for what?

vostok 1 · Post by **vostok 1** » Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:58 pm

Does Shelley Louise count in the context of stripeysydney?s question.

You wished to participate in consensual voyeurism with me, ie you asking to see my Bum (preferably with a ?breadstick sticking out? and promised a picture of your breasts in return.
http://bgafd.co.uk/forum/read.php?f=3&i=192599&t=192599

Jean-Honor? Fragonard?s 1967 painting ?The Swing? depicts voyeurism (you would refer to it as stalking) from a one sided perspective: The voyeur, is hidden in the bushes. As the lady goes high on the swing, he tries to take a furtive peep at her exposed genitals.
[img]http://i304.photobucket.com/albums/nn18 ... _Swing.jpg[/img]

However, since you offered publicly to participate in ?if you show me yours, I will show you mine? role play this would indicate that you wanted to view my Bum as either an object of sexually gratification or you were performing a type of domination, humiliation, and coercion.

But either way, you wanted to form an interpersonal relationship with me (unlike the scene depicted in ?The Swing?) which involved a form of social association, connection, or affiliation between me and yourself, even though our interaction would have been limited to you looking at a jpg of my ass and me looking at a jpg of your breasts.

Or more likely, you were on a voyage of Schadenfreude, or as Jacques would say: ?Se r?jouir du malheur d?autrui.?

Shelley Louise · Post by **Shelley Louise** » Wed Jul 02, 2008 5:03 pm

You wished to participate in consensual voyeurism with me, ie you asking to see my Bum (preferably with a ?breadstick sticking out? and promised a picture of your breasts in return

I can't see in that link where I promised to send my tits?

egafd.com

Babe Station, Bang Babes.

Babe Station, Bang Babes.

Re: Babe Station, Bang Babes.

Re: Babe Station, Bang Babes.

Re: Babe Station, Bang Babes.

Re: Babe Station, Bang Babes.

Re: Babe Station, Bang Babes.

stripeysydney.

Re: Babe Station, Bang Babes.

Count for what?

Re: Count for what?