equal pay for women?
-
JonnyHungwell
- Posts: 1230
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: equal pay for women?
Yes, if they do exactly the same job.
-
Sam Slater
- Posts: 11624
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: equal pay for women?
You have to ask?
[i]I used to spend a lot of time criticizing Islam on here in the noughties - but things are much better now.[/i]
Re: equal pay for women?
As long as they accept the bad bits of equality, fine with me.
We have need of you again, great king.
Re: equal pay for women?
Yes but will they also be happy to accept that the retirement age will have to be equal to the mens?? Only way it can work I am afraid if they want total equality not selective ...
PEOPLE think Stephen Hawking is so clever, but when you ask him a question and he is typing in the answer on his little screen, how do we know he isn't just looking up the answer on the Internet?
-
JonnyHungwell
- Posts: 1230
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: equal pay for women?
I once worked with a woman who couldn't work overtime after 12 noon on Sundays ---- because she needed to go home to put the Yorkshire Puddings on
You just had to laugh.
Re: equal pay for women?
crofter wrote:
>>
I think that the UK retirement ages may now indeed be equal (not sure - would have to check) but I take your point, crofter.
Seems to me that much is always made of discrimination against women (be it real or perceived). It's invariably seen as a major societal injustice that needs to be swept aside at any cost. Whereas discrimination against men on the other hand (and it exists in abundance in many areas) never seems to be regarded as much of a priority or a problem.
I've met so many women over the years in both a private and personal capacity who've banged on majorly about "equality" etc. yet who've always expected men to defer to them, help them take their coats off, vacate seats for them, pick up the tab etc. etc. Even walk on the outside of the pavement!
Of course not all women are like that, but many still are: They want "equality" when it suits them and works to their advantage. But they also want / expect all the old-fashioned male chivalry as well. And of course where there's already discrimnation **in favour of** women (family law, so-called 'potivive discrimination quotas' etc.). that's always 'justifiable', 'understandable' or at the very least 'explainable'.
A lot of this 'unequal pay' thing is a myth anyway (and of course when women happen to earn more than men, that's okay!). Where it exists at all it's due not to deliberate discrimination but to women taking extended maternity breaks etc. which is bound to have a disruptive effect on their careers.
Despite the best efforts of the feminist lobby to preted that there's no difference between men and women, you can't effectively legislate against biology. You certainly can't ignore it.
- Eric
>>
I think that the UK retirement ages may now indeed be equal (not sure - would have to check) but I take your point, crofter.
Seems to me that much is always made of discrimination against women (be it real or perceived). It's invariably seen as a major societal injustice that needs to be swept aside at any cost. Whereas discrimination against men on the other hand (and it exists in abundance in many areas) never seems to be regarded as much of a priority or a problem.
I've met so many women over the years in both a private and personal capacity who've banged on majorly about "equality" etc. yet who've always expected men to defer to them, help them take their coats off, vacate seats for them, pick up the tab etc. etc. Even walk on the outside of the pavement!
Of course not all women are like that, but many still are: They want "equality" when it suits them and works to their advantage. But they also want / expect all the old-fashioned male chivalry as well. And of course where there's already discrimnation **in favour of** women (family law, so-called 'potivive discrimination quotas' etc.). that's always 'justifiable', 'understandable' or at the very least 'explainable'.
A lot of this 'unequal pay' thing is a myth anyway (and of course when women happen to earn more than men, that's okay!). Where it exists at all it's due not to deliberate discrimination but to women taking extended maternity breaks etc. which is bound to have a disruptive effect on their careers.
Despite the best efforts of the feminist lobby to preted that there's no difference between men and women, you can't effectively legislate against biology. You certainly can't ignore it.
- Eric
-
Dave Wells
- Posts: 2717
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: equal pay for women?
This business (porn) is the perfect example of the opposite !
Dave Wells
http://www.dave-wells.co.uk
http://www.dave-wells.co.uk
Re: equal pay for women?
>>
I meant of course "private and professional" (work).
- Eric
I meant of course "private and professional" (work).
- Eric
Re: equal pay for women?
Interesting link on the pay gap "discrimination" myth. It's American, but the same principles apply:
- Eric
- Eric