Katie Price loses out on Sex and the City role.

[rhino]

Katie Price has failed to win a role in the Hollywood sequel to Sex And The City, says a report.

The 31-year-old recently auditioned for the part of Irish Nanny Erin in the movie, says The Sun.

However, insiders told the newspaper that the glamour model failed to get through to the last 20 and suggested that she may have been "too old" for the role.

Katie went up against 70 girls who all wanted to play the "naturally sexy" big-boobed nanny at the auditions in London.

A source allegedly told the newspaper: "Jordan was never going to be able to play that part. She's deluded.

"All the botox in the world won't shave a decade off her.

"Bosses wanted someone fresh-faced, natural and young.

"Jordan is none of those things. She may have the big boobs, but they don't look natural."

The insider added that they thought that Katie was totally unsuited to the role.

The source said: "The character has to be good with children. Jordan might be a good mum, but she doesn't come across as a warm, fun figure who goes cart-wheeling with someone else's kids."



This article is powered by Well Contented Ltd

[supsim96]

good. she doesn't have the intellect to make any sort of a half-decent actress!

[mutanthalibut]

Yeah.... She's just a 'Dumb Blonde'... Who has managed to amass a ?40million fortune..... I wish I was that 'Dumb'.

[supsim96]

well, if you invest in some huge plastic tits, there could be hope for you yet . . . . . .

[Floydoid]

supsim96 wrote:

> well, if you invest in some huge plastic tits, there could be hope for you yet . . . . . .

I preferred her in her early modelling days, long before she used the moniker Jordan, and when she still had her natural tits. She looked pretty decent back then, and nothing like the silicone bimbo she is now.

[crofter]

Lol I doubt the casting couch director wasn't impressed by her slack fanny then?? I give her a couple of years and she will be the voice of the female nation and presenting LOOSE WOMEN ...

[Sam Slater]

Wow. With a name like 'porn historian' I thought you'd have more respect to use 'slapper' and imply that making low budget porn movies is somehow demeaning ? all on a forum based on girls who are -as illiberal members of the public would call- 'slappers' who make low budget porn movies.

You seem to be the sort of guy that's against everything this forum's supposed to admire.

Maybe this forum isn't for you 'pornhistorian'*

*what a laugh.