> why would a "millionaire" like Cameron want to be
> Prime Minister for a measly 120K when he has earn't and could
> earn far more in the private sector ?
I can't beieve you're naive enough to ask that question.
POWER.
And then, look at how much ex-PM Blur is raking in......
> This inverse snobbery that we see being spouted here, about how
> someone from Eton should not be PM
Isn't what you perceive as 'inverted snobbery' merely a rational
reaction on the part of the mass of the ruled to the disconnect
between them and their [poorly-mandated] rulers?
Wouldn't it be, just for once, to have a PM who ISN'T from the
ruling-class or its fringes? Just for a laugh, and to see if there
really is a democracy here?
Oh, my sides are splitting.. what a silly notion. Oh, dearie me.
Sorry.
> They could have such an easier and more comfortable life in the
> private sector. Rather than your Labour comrades who really do
> have a financial incentive but are oh so good at pretending
> it's for the greater good....."the greater good"
Yes; let's have more greedy people in parliament. For the 'greater
good', of course....
'Greed is good'- whether it's for power [or money], or money [or
power].
What a world you plan to create. Prospero would be thrilled.