Harriet Harman vs Punternet

A place to socialise and share opinions with other members of the BGAFD Community.
Muffinman
Posts: 100
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Harriet Harman vs Punternet

Post by Muffinman »



The woman is beyond fucking belief! She thinks she is entitled to use government time and public money to ask favours from the Governor of California that American law would rule unconstitutional in a second.

Not only that - because she knows there is no chance - she only did it so she would have a soundbite or a column inch that would bolster her grotesque self-image.

And why the fuck is she so bothered about punternet - one of the oldest adult sites on the internet?

" ?There is now a website ? where pimps put women on sale for sex and then men who?ve bought sex with them put their comments online" she told Labour delegates. So???? What on earth is she about??
Tony__T
Posts: 452
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Harriet Harman vs Punternet

Post by Tony__T »

And you can bet that the majority of the delegates rushed back to their hotel rooms that night to google 'Punternet'.

Stupid woman. Hasn't the battle against illegal file sharing taught her anything? You shut one site down, another will spring up in it's place. There's already loads of sites similar to Punternet - is she going to close all those down? What about Adultwork? Is that next on Harriet's list?

I'm no Tory, but I do despair at these idiots in charge, I really do.
number 6
Posts: 2053
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Harriet Harman vs Punternet

Post by number 6 »

I hate this woman,interfering busy body old bag. The labour party doesn't need feminist gone mad types like her in it.
number 6
Posts: 2053
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Harriet Harman vs Punternet

Post by number 6 »

Has she ever considered that some prostitutes may actually enjoy what they do? Hard to believe Harriet you dried old cow but its true luv.
RoddersUK
Posts: 1915
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Harriet Harman vs Punternet

Post by RoddersUK »

!cool!

This fucking harridan and the rest of the ragbag army of shitheads infesting Brighton at present are a good example of why we need a revolution and a minimum of 5 years Martial Law. Since 1642 the British Army and the Royal Navy have been the saviours of this country and are professional enough to sort out all of the bastards infesting this Sceptered Isle and return it to our Gracious Sovereign to Rule.

RoddersUK
b217bravo
Posts: 379
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Harriet Harman vs Punternet

Post by b217bravo »

Harlot Harman is probably just miffed because she found hubby (Jack Dromey) scouring Punternet for some decent company whilst in Brighton.
F**k knows the poor guy needs it, fancy waking up to the Harlot each morning, UGH.
geoff
Muffinman
Posts: 100
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Harriet Harman vs Punternet

Post by Muffinman »


"why we need a revolution and a minimum of 5 years Martial Law"

I'm sure it's good for your health to express yourself so violently - better out than in, eh!

However, there is so much confusion in two sentences that you surely cannot expect anyone to agree with your opinion. Perhaps you don't.

It's the people who make a revolution - unless you're talking about all those soft furnishing revolutions in Eastern Europe (velvet, orange, etc). The British army and navy would be used to put a real revolution down.

So you really want martial law. Well, for one thing, that would fuck up the army and navy completely. Soldiers do not shoot the people they grew up with without qualms. Foreigners, no problem. But shooting ordinary people on the streets of Britain would force them to question whether they were on the right side. Many would mutiny.

The saviours of this country when it needed saving from Hitler were very ordinary people, drafted into the army and navy. Unfortunately, our much smaller professional military is now thoroughly politicised. Look at all the New Labour generals, with their smooth PR, when they are in a war in Afghanistan that nobody knows the reason for or the objectives, because they change with every political wind.

Or the politically correct police chiefs. They can't wait to "lead beyond authority" as their Common Purpose training has prepared them to do.

Face it, Rodders, the Queen has for far too long accepted lying and traitorous ministers who rule in her name, and is far too comfortable to bite the hand that votes the Civil List.
Locked