I was reading through some documentation regarding the powers of Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs, it read, "We have seen these new powers used where HMRC undertake, "Cross tax" enquiries, into tax, vat & PAYE and for some clients there may be nowhere to hide because ANYONE FOUND GUILTY OF CONCEALING OR DESTROYING DOCUMENTS FACE FINES AND UP TO TWO YEARS IN PRISON!"
Then I remember reading this:
Don't ya just hate the smarmy, oily, Bush's arse wipe? He gets away with everything!
One law for Blair and one law for the rest of us?
One law for Blair and one law for the rest of us?
<http://www.jimslip.com>
Winner "Best Loved Character"TVX SHAFTAS 2010
Winner of "Best On-Line scene & Best Gonzo Production" at UKAP Awards 2006
Winner of Best TVX series 2011, "Laras Anal Adventures"
Winner "Best Loved Character"TVX SHAFTAS 2010
Winner of "Best On-Line scene & Best Gonzo Production" at UKAP Awards 2006
Winner of Best TVX series 2011, "Laras Anal Adventures"
Re: One law for Blair and one law for the rest of us?
I couldnt give a fck how smarmy and oily he was,the country got better under him.
Re: One law for Blair and one law for the rest of us?
Define 'better' in the context of the thread.
-
David Johnson
- Posts: 7844
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
James
First, the Commons officials state in the story they were destroyed by mistake. They may have, they may not have been destroyed by mistake. I agree that it looks suspicious.
The sum concerned as the story you link to states "The Sunday Times?s FOI request in January 2005 to see his claims for ?43,029 of public money covering a three-year period". Given the role of Prime Minister and as we subsequently see the money-making opportunities it provides, this seems a relatively small amount (14K a year) to risk a potential criminal charge.
If you wish to carry on your analysis, here is a link to Blair's other claims.
http://mpsallowances.parliament.uk/mpsl ... ony-blair/
Perhaps you can extend your forensic activity to Danny Alexander, the Lib Dem, Chief Secretary to the Treasury who claimed ?37,000 in expenses from the House of Commons for his London flat he stated was his second home. The home which he then sold at a substantial profit having told the Revenue that it was his main residence thus avoiding capital gains tax.
Alternatively you might like to look into where the over 100,000 euros that the Cleggster snaffled in TOTALLY UNRECEIPTED EXPENSES as part of his time as a Euro MP, actually went to.
No party came out very well in the expenses scandal, did they?
Cheers
D
The sum concerned as the story you link to states "The Sunday Times?s FOI request in January 2005 to see his claims for ?43,029 of public money covering a three-year period". Given the role of Prime Minister and as we subsequently see the money-making opportunities it provides, this seems a relatively small amount (14K a year) to risk a potential criminal charge.
If you wish to carry on your analysis, here is a link to Blair's other claims.
http://mpsallowances.parliament.uk/mpsl ... ony-blair/
Perhaps you can extend your forensic activity to Danny Alexander, the Lib Dem, Chief Secretary to the Treasury who claimed ?37,000 in expenses from the House of Commons for his London flat he stated was his second home. The home which he then sold at a substantial profit having told the Revenue that it was his main residence thus avoiding capital gains tax.
Alternatively you might like to look into where the over 100,000 euros that the Cleggster snaffled in TOTALLY UNRECEIPTED EXPENSES as part of his time as a Euro MP, actually went to.
No party came out very well in the expenses scandal, did they?
Cheers
D
Re: One law for Blair and one law for the rest of us?
Firstly, I thought in law, "Not knowing" isn't a defence. Blairs team of crooks stated they didn't know it was illegal to shred his expenses. What tosh!
Secondly, with the whole World in a crazed credit, free for all, during Warmonger Blair's rule, I reckon "The country would have got better" even with one of the PG Tips chimps running it!
If I could borrow a few million quid and squander it on myself, life would certainly "Get better" for me and for the people who made the things I was squandering the wonga on.........until I had to pay it back.
That's the whole point, now it's payback time!!sad!
PS On another point, doesn't it make you vomit, that to protect his lecture circuit in the USA, which is worth millions. Blair, in his autobiography, brown nosed Bush so much so, that you couldn't see his head for shit!
Secondly, with the whole World in a crazed credit, free for all, during Warmonger Blair's rule, I reckon "The country would have got better" even with one of the PG Tips chimps running it!
If I could borrow a few million quid and squander it on myself, life would certainly "Get better" for me and for the people who made the things I was squandering the wonga on.........until I had to pay it back.
That's the whole point, now it's payback time!!sad!
PS On another point, doesn't it make you vomit, that to protect his lecture circuit in the USA, which is worth millions. Blair, in his autobiography, brown nosed Bush so much so, that you couldn't see his head for shit!
<http://www.jimslip.com>
Winner "Best Loved Character"TVX SHAFTAS 2010
Winner of "Best On-Line scene & Best Gonzo Production" at UKAP Awards 2006
Winner of Best TVX series 2011, "Laras Anal Adventures"
Winner "Best Loved Character"TVX SHAFTAS 2010
Winner of "Best On-Line scene & Best Gonzo Production" at UKAP Awards 2006
Winner of Best TVX series 2011, "Laras Anal Adventures"
Re: One law for Blair and one law for the rest of us?
Oh no it fucking didn't!
Tony B Liar and his bunch of gobshytes took more control from everyone else than any government. All in the name of self centered satisfuckingfaction.
The fucking police do fuckall.
The country is awash with illegal immigrants. Fuckem. My hard earned taxes are paying towards these fucking money grabbing bastard leeches.
If anyone thinks that the Human Rights Act is a good idea then they are as fucking stupid as the arsehole who dreamed it up so that his fucking greedy missus could make a fortune as a Human Rights fucking Lawyer.
That's just a few. I'm sure there are many more out there who can come up with more.
Tony B Liar and his bunch of gobshytes took more control from everyone else than any government. All in the name of self centered satisfuckingfaction.
The fucking police do fuckall.
The country is awash with illegal immigrants. Fuckem. My hard earned taxes are paying towards these fucking money grabbing bastard leeches.
If anyone thinks that the Human Rights Act is a good idea then they are as fucking stupid as the arsehole who dreamed it up so that his fucking greedy missus could make a fortune as a Human Rights fucking Lawyer.
That's just a few. I'm sure there are many more out there who can come up with more.
RoddersUK
Re: One law for Blair and one law for the rest of us?
Wouldn't the Expenses Office have copies of what they've paid out and to whom?
As for Clegg, I bet that whatever he claimed is small beer compared to what the rest of the ROBBING DUPLICITOUS BASTARDS in Europe claimed and are still claiming.
As for Clegg, I bet that whatever he claimed is small beer compared to what the rest of the ROBBING DUPLICITOUS BASTARDS in Europe claimed and are still claiming.
RoddersUK
-
David Johnson
- Posts: 7844
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
RoddersUK
"As for Clegg, I bet that whatever he claimed is small beer compared to what the rest of the ROBBING DUPLICITOUS BASTARDS in Europe claimed and are still claiming."
Wrong.
Just as Labour MP, Chris Mullins pointed out that the Cleggster was a maximum claimer of expenses whilst listening to Clegg harangue the House of Commons over the expenses scandal.
MPs from all the main parties had their noses in the trough, Clegg as much as most.
Cheers
D
Wrong.
Just as Labour MP, Chris Mullins pointed out that the Cleggster was a maximum claimer of expenses whilst listening to Clegg harangue the House of Commons over the expenses scandal.
MPs from all the main parties had their noses in the trough, Clegg as much as most.
Cheers
D
-
andy at handiwork
- Posts: 4113
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: One law for Blair and one law for the rest of us?
Which bit of the protections the Act gives to ALL OF US would you like to see rescinded?
The right to life ? protects your life, by law. The state is required to investigate suspicious deaths and deaths in custody.
The prohibition of torture and inhuman treatment ? you should never be tortured or treated in an inhuman or degrading way, no matter what the situation.
Protection against slavery and forced labour ? you should not be treated like a slave or subjected to forced labour.
The right to liberty and freedom ? you have the right to be free and the state can only imprison you with very good reason ? for example, if you are convicted of a crime.
The right to a fair trial and no punishment without law - you are innocent until proven guilty. If accused of a crime, you have the right to hear the evidence against you, in a court of law.
Respect for privacy and family life and the right to marry ? protects against unnecessary surveillance or intrusion into your life. You have the right to marry and raise a family.
Freedom of thought, religion and belief ? you can believe what you like and practise your religion or beliefs.
Free speech and peaceful protest ? you have a right to speak freely and join with others peacefully, to express your views.
No discrimination ? everyone?s rights are equal. You should not be treated unfairly ? because, for example, of your gender, race, sexuality, religion or age.
Protection of property, the right to an education and the right to free elections ? protects against state interference with your possessions; means that no child can be denied an education and that elections must be free and fair.
The right to life ? protects your life, by law. The state is required to investigate suspicious deaths and deaths in custody.
The prohibition of torture and inhuman treatment ? you should never be tortured or treated in an inhuman or degrading way, no matter what the situation.
Protection against slavery and forced labour ? you should not be treated like a slave or subjected to forced labour.
The right to liberty and freedom ? you have the right to be free and the state can only imprison you with very good reason ? for example, if you are convicted of a crime.
The right to a fair trial and no punishment without law - you are innocent until proven guilty. If accused of a crime, you have the right to hear the evidence against you, in a court of law.
Respect for privacy and family life and the right to marry ? protects against unnecessary surveillance or intrusion into your life. You have the right to marry and raise a family.
Freedom of thought, religion and belief ? you can believe what you like and practise your religion or beliefs.
Free speech and peaceful protest ? you have a right to speak freely and join with others peacefully, to express your views.
No discrimination ? everyone?s rights are equal. You should not be treated unfairly ? because, for example, of your gender, race, sexuality, religion or age.
Protection of property, the right to an education and the right to free elections ? protects against state interference with your possessions; means that no child can be denied an education and that elections must be free and fair.
Re: RoddersUK
I didn't say he didn't did I?
What I said was that what he claimed would be small beer compared to what the bastard useless fuckwit MEPs would have, and still are claiming.
Clegg is one of those career MPs who's done fuckall but con some cunts into voting him into, first Europe as an MEP and then into Parliament as one of those useless bastard Liberals, who now he has a bit of authority looks as if he no longer wants to be a useless bastard Liberal.
He's a fucking politician. They represent themselves first and then their constituents. Bastards all.
What I said was that what he claimed would be small beer compared to what the bastard useless fuckwit MEPs would have, and still are claiming.
Clegg is one of those career MPs who's done fuckall but con some cunts into voting him into, first Europe as an MEP and then into Parliament as one of those useless bastard Liberals, who now he has a bit of authority looks as if he no longer wants to be a useless bastard Liberal.
He's a fucking politician. They represent themselves first and then their constituents. Bastards all.
RoddersUK