Hi,
This is a message from The Adult Channel.
The UK's only LIVE uncut sex show is back on your screens every saturday at midnight until the start of November. Tune into to channel 986 on Sky or go to http://www.theadultchannel.co.uk/sxtv
We're using this forum string to find out what you guys are really after...yeah we all know you want harder action, and we're showing you the most we're allowed to....
Sex postions....fantasies....fetishes....let us know!!!
We're the UK's first adult channel.....help us keep it the best!
SXTV is back!
-
Sir joe king
Re: SXTV is back!
technically ladies and gentlemen this is called 'flogging a dead horse'
-
pornwatcher
Re: SXTV is back!
or dont bother at all lets be honest if last week is anything to go by, im having an early night with my inflateable woman much more fun even the rerun in the week was so bad it was unbearable ,
-
woodgnome
Re: SXTV is back!
so you didn't like it... the people who made sxtv are inviting you to tell them why, to explain to them what you would like to see. so, instead of just moaning about it, why not make some positive suggestions? they might listen!
we know that 'the adult channel' and 'televsionx' operate under broadcasting constraints we don't agree with but that isn't THEIR fault. we deserve to be treated like adults by the powers that be but unfortunately, that isn't the case as things stand. if this means, as some people on the forum seem to be suggesting, that softcore isn't worthy of putting on air, then the only alternative is to have no indigenous adult programming whatsoever. surely that would be the most dismal scenario of all.
the people who make these programmes are asking for your input, so give it them.
we know that 'the adult channel' and 'televsionx' operate under broadcasting constraints we don't agree with but that isn't THEIR fault. we deserve to be treated like adults by the powers that be but unfortunately, that isn't the case as things stand. if this means, as some people on the forum seem to be suggesting, that softcore isn't worthy of putting on air, then the only alternative is to have no indigenous adult programming whatsoever. surely that would be the most dismal scenario of all.
the people who make these programmes are asking for your input, so give it them.
-
pornwatcher
Re: SXTV is back!
well were do you want me to start
bad camera work bad acting a radio playing in the background or was it someone talking through the whole show the girls looked bored and not sure what to do or how they were going to last the length of the program at one point it was like sex on the liberary floor everyting went quiet apart from the radio then a camera bloke called one of the girls to look at the camera it was not a patch on the old sxtv and that was average this in my humble opinion was dire ,
if you have any chance of making this show work you need real girls that are down to earth . rather have my blow up woman im saving up for a better one off real doll.com lol
the program was all to false and the whole point of a live program is interaction between callers there was not enough
best
mike
bad camera work bad acting a radio playing in the background or was it someone talking through the whole show the girls looked bored and not sure what to do or how they were going to last the length of the program at one point it was like sex on the liberary floor everyting went quiet apart from the radio then a camera bloke called one of the girls to look at the camera it was not a patch on the old sxtv and that was average this in my humble opinion was dire ,
if you have any chance of making this show work you need real girls that are down to earth . rather have my blow up woman im saving up for a better one off real doll.com lol
the program was all to false and the whole point of a live program is interaction between callers there was not enough
best
mike
-
Frank
Re: SXTV is back!
Whether you are right or not its not the girl's fault. It really was a live programme, not scripted so no-one could be sure how it would turn out.
Maybe one problem is that if the girls had been rehearsing since mid afternoon, by the time it was on for live at 11pm they not at their best!
The extra bits shown wednesday were from the webcam continuation that continued after the satellite transmission so thats why there was no talking. Maybe that should have ben explained.
Maybe one problem is that if the girls had been rehearsing since mid afternoon, by the time it was on for live at 11pm they not at their best!
The extra bits shown wednesday were from the webcam continuation that continued after the satellite transmission so thats why there was no talking. Maybe that should have ben explained.
-
Chrispornstar
Re: SXTV is back!
I agree with Pornwatcher - it is over-hyped and poor and not a patch on the last series (..so far!)
Maybe it's the choice of presenters (though the guests have so far been excellent!) who seem to be wooden and false (and not in the slightest bit erotic - and I love nothing more than seeing girls sat with no panties on).
In my humble opinion, both TAC and TVX seem to be getting WORSE, with far too many repeats (and always of the same goddamn episodes on TAC. Why?) The Adult Channels programmes always to me (*in the main) seem to be far too staged and "acted" (glorious exception to this rule is "Cum Drinking Sluts"), and all the best TVX programmes were made and first shown in 2000/2001 (i.e. the fabulous Anna Span stuff). The only new shows worth watching on TVX now are Marino's fabulous Road Trips (Roll on the R18 video releases!)
I'm not knocking the presenters, the girls unnecessarily nor am I being unconstuctive, it's merely my opinion that things aren't as good as they were, nor as good as they could be!
Chris
Maybe it's the choice of presenters (though the guests have so far been excellent!) who seem to be wooden and false (and not in the slightest bit erotic - and I love nothing more than seeing girls sat with no panties on).
In my humble opinion, both TAC and TVX seem to be getting WORSE, with far too many repeats (and always of the same goddamn episodes on TAC. Why?) The Adult Channels programmes always to me (*in the main) seem to be far too staged and "acted" (glorious exception to this rule is "Cum Drinking Sluts"), and all the best TVX programmes were made and first shown in 2000/2001 (i.e. the fabulous Anna Span stuff). The only new shows worth watching on TVX now are Marino's fabulous Road Trips (Roll on the R18 video releases!)
I'm not knocking the presenters, the girls unnecessarily nor am I being unconstuctive, it's merely my opinion that things aren't as good as they were, nor as good as they could be!
Chris
-
Richard B
Re: SXTV is back!
I think the previous posters are being very hard on Elen and Michelle who I think are trying their best and doing a good job in difficult circumstances.
There are four problems as I see it - first, the sound is terrible - the girls seem to be feet away from the nesarest microphones and, particularly early on last night, you could tell; second, the set seems just poked away in a corner and is more than a bit dingy compared to last year; third, for some reason, the telephone interaction just doesn't appear to be working, and a lot of that is down to the callers, mumbling, incoherent and then putting the phone down.
The fourth and final problem I see affecting a lot of TAC programmes at the moment - they hardly show us anything. I an only guess someone at the TV body that regulates them had read the riot act recently because the camerawork is very timid indeed.
Anyway, it is good that the Adult Channel ask us for our views, I'm pleased they make the programmes that they do and the problems (apart from camerawork) are pretty easily solved.
Natasha Vale as a guest would be a top call for me, as would Sarah Daykin. And keep up the dirty talk.
Now, what can we do to get the TV regulator to ease up? Just what is the probem with showing a girl using a dildo (or even inserting a finger) on an Adult subscription channel after midnight?
There are four problems as I see it - first, the sound is terrible - the girls seem to be feet away from the nesarest microphones and, particularly early on last night, you could tell; second, the set seems just poked away in a corner and is more than a bit dingy compared to last year; third, for some reason, the telephone interaction just doesn't appear to be working, and a lot of that is down to the callers, mumbling, incoherent and then putting the phone down.
The fourth and final problem I see affecting a lot of TAC programmes at the moment - they hardly show us anything. I an only guess someone at the TV body that regulates them had read the riot act recently because the camerawork is very timid indeed.
Anyway, it is good that the Adult Channel ask us for our views, I'm pleased they make the programmes that they do and the problems (apart from camerawork) are pretty easily solved.
Natasha Vale as a guest would be a top call for me, as would Sarah Daykin. And keep up the dirty talk.
Now, what can we do to get the TV regulator to ease up? Just what is the probem with showing a girl using a dildo (or even inserting a finger) on an Adult subscription channel after midnight?
-
alec
Re: SXTV is back!
It seems to me that there are too few medium distance shots. These are better in general in all porn, in my opinion, and in this case, along with the fact that the girls are no longer perched on stools, it cuts down the possibilities of the viewer catching what seem to be unintended revealing glimpses. Revealing glimpses now seem to depend on the producer making a deliberate choice and changing to a different camera. Perhaps this is deliberate policy, which has been forced on the channel, but I think it is the main reason why the current series is not as effective as the last.