SXTV is back!

A read-only and searchable archive of posts made to the BGAFD forum from 11/08/2000 to 14/03/2003.
pornwatcher

Re: SXTV is back!

Post by pornwatcher »

i agree with all those points also i would like to rename another adult channel disaster the big flop
they really need to pull there socks up they were better 6 months ago ,im thinking of going over to tvx can anyone tell me is it better and do they have the likes of chanta ,cathy and laura jones .as for frank why should you have to explain things we are paying to watch this surely you should be screening somthing worthy of our subscription and im not having a go at the girls but in my opinion they do not fit in with the program sorry
get some girls that enjoy sex and dont just do it for the money
no disrespect ment to the girls
we want real people
mike
Frank

Re: SXTV is back!

Post by Frank »

Poor TAC they are getting stick - and the lesson for them is pretty clear. Go back to pre-recorded sessions.

Previous SXTVs were pre-recorded. The questions, action, camera angles, editing presentation all were carefully constructed to give the viwers a planned contructed package.

SXTV Raw is live. Truly live. Even the phone calls are live. Nothing can be properly planned. The viewer gets it as it is -unedited.

Those complaining about too much staged action should be applauding. The problem is that edited staged action gives a better programme. Everything, once planned contructed and edited gives the viewer better camera angles, crap is edited out and only the best bits left in.

They were brave in trying it truly live - what a pity if they get panned for it.
Richard B

Re: SXTV is back!

Post by Richard B »

Sorry Frank, last year's SXTV Live was live (on Saturdays) because, dear BGAFDers, I phoned up and got on (I'd had had a couple of cold drinks, you understand). It was fun.
woodgnome

Re: SXTV is back!

Post by woodgnome »

complete and utter cobblers, old chap! i rang up sxtv in it's previous incarnation and lo, as i spoke my foul utterances into the phone, so my voice came out of the idiot box in the corner of my living room!

katie was very happy to speak to me - she's got a thing about gnomes - but unfortunately my request was too perverse for those present in the studio to perform with the requisite alacrity. the attempt was warmly appreciated, though.
Frank

Re: SXTV is back!

Post by Frank »

Oops I guessed wrong about the old series (which I never saw!) so I was talking through my hat about that. Sorry! But my point about the girls being there all day and tired by the time it started has some truth to it.
buttsie

Re: SXTV is back!

Post by buttsie »

Not that I've ever seen the shows in question because I'm down here in that colony called Australia,I think everything should be put in perspective.

Seems to me the fees being charged are a pittance.
Just ask yourself what else could you be buying for your monthly subscription.In that perspective its probably not bad value.

If i were a subscriber I'd be taping the shows and then watchng them.If something really stinks you fast forward through it,same as if a vid scene doesn't appeal.

cheers
B...OZ
browser

Re: SXTV is back!

Post by browser »

For buttsie since you're outside Europe, TAC and TVX are run under pretty strict rules, even though they run on encrypted channels via satellite / cable so cannot be accidentally picked up by minors.

The fees being charged "a pittance" is because higher fees could not easily be charged, in my opinion (I was a subscriber some time ago, but to be frank, the UK laws stink and limit the services in a major way, so you hardly get to see pussy lips let alone anything stronger!)

There are hardcore shows on the internet which I can watch with women masturbating, using toys, and in girl/guy or girl/girl up to threesomes and swapping, all for under US$ 15 a month, which is similar (I assume) to what these TV channels charge.

I don't know what adult TV services exist in Australia, but I think you have a more open approach and might have stronger material there.
buttsie

Re: SXTV is back!

Post by buttsie »

lol

More open minded...I don't think so...read some of the articles atthis site



It paints a very bleak future of censorship on all levels by being lead by religious Politicians...see the section on Hypocrites...makes you wonder about those leading good Christian lives who take the high moral ground.

As for Sex Tv in Australia.As far as i am aware it doesn't exist.Wether our market is too small or there are laws prohibiting it I don't know.

We still have laws that prohibit vids from being sold in the 6 States so we order them from our 2 territories.Absolute stupidity...all because of moral values.

rant over

B...OZ
browser

Re: SXTV is back!

Post by browser »

I'll take a look - I did see a piece recently about the problems of distributing porn films by post, and the Sharon Austen web store had to have the tapes sent from Canberra (?) or the USA.

Take a look at reviews of Television X on www.dooyoo.co.uk which gets consumer comments I was searching for this site again and was a little surprised some users had commented - even more surprised at the number of "this was useful" votes from women's accounts (wonder if they personally saw the review, or their partner took a look and didn't know it would register their user id!).

I guess the majority of viewers are male, but then again, there are some very horny female presenters who have also appeared in UK shows looking into lesbian clubs and entertainment (mostly in London, of course) so I shouldn't be so surprised... softcore lesbian action might be just the turn-on for a bi-curious wife!

(and softcore is about the most they'll get on TV for now :-)
Locked