Vida Garman more popular than Michelle Thorne

A read-only and searchable archive of posts made to the BGAFD forum from 11/08/2000 to 14/03/2003.
Crimpo

Re: Vida Garman more popular than Michelle Thorne

Post by Crimpo »

pornrumors - well its good to see they aren't still just sticking to their own cut and pastes and tedious links to escort sites - ah how can Luke Ford (for surely it is he) have sunk so low...

Vida and Michelle - both astounding in my view...
m.t

Re: Vida Garman more popular than Michelle Thorne

Post by m.t »

please note xxxmichellethorne.com has NO connection with michelle thorne and is NOT endorsed by michelle thorne the only offical site is
Chrispornstar

Re: Vida Garman more popular than Michelle Thorne

Post by Chrispornstar »

Synthetic, sexless porndoll. Couldn't have put it better myself.
Spot-on yet again Dibble!
Chrispornstar

Re: Beatles more popular than God

Post by Chrispornstar »

Nah! The Great Lennon mis-quote was that they were more popular than Jesus. And in 1965 they probably were. But not in 1975 were they more popular than The Bay City Rollers, which is probably closer to the Garman-Thorne comparison!
Pierre

Re: Vida Garman more popular than Michelle Thorne

Post by Pierre »

What's all this comparison crap? Just be grateful that all these gorgeous, scrumtious women do what they do and make us chaps (and a few females) very happy...that's ALL that really matters eh?
carl

Re: Vida Garman more popular than Michelle Thorne

Post by carl »

utter arse. i'd take michelle anyday over vidal, or whatever his name is.
jj

Re: Beatles more popular than God

Post by jj »

It was the sixties, remember? And if you can remember them....
......aside from the vexed issue of the Triune nature of the Judaeo-Christian deity, I can't quite get the BCR analogy.
Les McKeown/Vida? Nah...........
Cumstoppe

Re: Vida Garman more popular than Michelle Thorne

Post by Cumstoppe »

Mines too
Locked