In my opinion - BAD!!!
I remember the first series with Emma, Tamara, Katie-Ann and Laura which was excellent. That was money well spent as there used to be quite a few 'slip-ups' which was good.
This new series is completely drab and uninspiring. Michelle makes stupid mistakes by looking at the wrong camera all the time and having no idea how to use the computer whislt the other girl (name is on the tip of my tongue) keeps the show afloat.
There are no slip-ups and the guests have been average to say the least.
Just finished watching the Nadia episode tonight and was frustrated at just brief glances of the superbabe. Is it true that the Wednesday repeat adds extra-scenes or is that also bull****?
VERY DISAPPOINTED AT TAC RECENT SHOWS ALTHOUGH REBEKAH TEASDALE ON SAMMY GETS HER GIRL WAS APPRECIATED. PLEASE IMPROVE THE SERVICE AND PLEASE MORE NADIA!!!
Is the new SXTV - ....good or bad!!!
-
marc s
Re: Is the new SXTV - ....good or bad!!!
i have to agree
im sure the likes of cathy b and sandie and laura would make better guests and boost it up a bit
im sure the likes of cathy b and sandie and laura would make better guests and boost it up a bit
-
The Fonz
Re: Is the new SXTV - ....good or bad!!!
As a subscriber to both TAC and TVX, I must say how bored I am of them. TVX is is the better of the two, but has been relying on too many re-re-re-re-re-re-repeats. TAC is tac, and getting worse. They repeat THE SAME EPISODES of the shows, and it's nearly all girl-girl (the only b/g seems to be those 2 pillocks on Neil Down - and that show is unbearable). Michelle Thorne is NOT a major talent [edited by moderator], she is the porn-lite equivelent of POP IDOL or FAME ACCADEMY and SXTV live is garbage, I'd rather watch Men and Motors!
-
Dave C
Re: Is the new SXTV - ....good or bad!!!
Hello all,
I haven't been able to post here recently as we've been very busy at the channel. However I feel it necessary to defend SXTV and the presenters Michelle and Elen.
Firstly please think about your posts before you post them, some of our girls regularly read this forum, and it's terribly upsetting for them to read blatently cruel remarks about them, although CONSTRUCTIVE criticism is appreciated.
Secondly in my opinion this series of SXTV is better than the previous shows. It is genuinely live (as were previous series), but in my mind is much more real than the last series. Michelle genuinely orgasms on quite a few of the shows (usually towards the end in the extra footage we film for Wednesday), and the presenters and guests really do get off on each other.
There is certainly a lot more sex content in this series than the last, and is actually much dirtier and as the title suggests, "raw". The stories the girls come out with are genuine, the sex as I said above, is REAL...they do cum...in fact if you could see them thanking each other when we cut then you'd realise that. I often leave them talking to each other (when they don't realise they are being recorded) in the edit which goes out on Wednesday, so watch that if you're in doubt.
Yes the girls are nervous...of course they are...but they do a very good job and hold the show together well, while still managing to get off on each other. It probably looks a little more contrived than the previous series' simply because it's RAW. In this series the girls have no ear-pieces to the gallery, no auto-cue, nothing....they just have to hold it together on their own with help from the floor manager letting them know when calls are coming through. This is real sex, this isn't faked. It might look a little less professional, but there again that's what reality is like. Real life sex just isn't like the carefully planned scenes you see in films, with moaning in all the right places....it's a bit sloppy, funnny, exciting, hot, but a little bit rough around the edges. That's what our show is all about. Maybe you're all just looking at it the wrong way and not appreciating it for what it is, it's supposed to be a bit different
Anyway, my rant is over. You are all entitled to your opinions and this post is not intended to be a promotional tool for the channel (Alec, Woodgnome please note), just a defence of comments made against our very hard working girls.
Finally if any of you have any comments on our shows (malicious venom does not constitute constructive criticism) then please e-mail me. I will do my best to invoke your ideas, as without our subscribers we are nothing. However, please don't ask me to show more explicit material, to cut a long story short, if we do then we get fined and closed down. Write to the ITC if you want our laws changed.
Thank you,
Dave Cooke
Head of Programming,
The Adult Channel, Spice, and Spice Platinum.
Playboy TV UK Ltd.
I haven't been able to post here recently as we've been very busy at the channel. However I feel it necessary to defend SXTV and the presenters Michelle and Elen.
Firstly please think about your posts before you post them, some of our girls regularly read this forum, and it's terribly upsetting for them to read blatently cruel remarks about them, although CONSTRUCTIVE criticism is appreciated.
Secondly in my opinion this series of SXTV is better than the previous shows. It is genuinely live (as were previous series), but in my mind is much more real than the last series. Michelle genuinely orgasms on quite a few of the shows (usually towards the end in the extra footage we film for Wednesday), and the presenters and guests really do get off on each other.
There is certainly a lot more sex content in this series than the last, and is actually much dirtier and as the title suggests, "raw". The stories the girls come out with are genuine, the sex as I said above, is REAL...they do cum...in fact if you could see them thanking each other when we cut then you'd realise that. I often leave them talking to each other (when they don't realise they are being recorded) in the edit which goes out on Wednesday, so watch that if you're in doubt.
Yes the girls are nervous...of course they are...but they do a very good job and hold the show together well, while still managing to get off on each other. It probably looks a little more contrived than the previous series' simply because it's RAW. In this series the girls have no ear-pieces to the gallery, no auto-cue, nothing....they just have to hold it together on their own with help from the floor manager letting them know when calls are coming through. This is real sex, this isn't faked. It might look a little less professional, but there again that's what reality is like. Real life sex just isn't like the carefully planned scenes you see in films, with moaning in all the right places....it's a bit sloppy, funnny, exciting, hot, but a little bit rough around the edges. That's what our show is all about. Maybe you're all just looking at it the wrong way and not appreciating it for what it is, it's supposed to be a bit different
Anyway, my rant is over. You are all entitled to your opinions and this post is not intended to be a promotional tool for the channel (Alec, Woodgnome please note), just a defence of comments made against our very hard working girls.
Finally if any of you have any comments on our shows (malicious venom does not constitute constructive criticism) then please e-mail me. I will do my best to invoke your ideas, as without our subscribers we are nothing. However, please don't ask me to show more explicit material, to cut a long story short, if we do then we get fined and closed down. Write to the ITC if you want our laws changed.
Thank you,
Dave Cooke
Head of Programming,
The Adult Channel, Spice, and Spice Platinum.
Playboy TV UK Ltd.