cc idsheets 106, 107, 144

[Rob4]

please have a look and see if you can name any of the unidentified models -all help appreciated


[IMG]http://img149.imagevenue.com/loc697/th_92360_IDSHEET_106a_123_697lo.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]http://img231.imagevenue.com/loc476/th_92372_IDSHEET_106b_123_476lo.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]http://img186.imagevenue.com/loc376/th_92377_IDSHEET_107a_123_376lo.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]http://img259.imagevenue.com/loc380/th_92379_IDSHEET_107b_123_380lo.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]http://img165.imagevenue.com/loc891/th_92381_IDSHEET_144a_123_891lo.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]http://img143.imagevenue.com/loc239/th_92400_IDSHEET_144b_123_239lo.jpg[/IMG]

[Texxx]

106f (b) = Stephanie Hart-Rodgers

107o = Szilvia Lauren

[Rob4]

106f is Gilly Sampson not 106f [a] - apologies for the mistake

144k = Renee Summers

[jj]

To clarify:
107 [d] (a)= Mercedes [4];
107 [d] (b)= Emanuell.

[Rob4]

yes this is correct

a few weeks ago Mercedes[4] was listed as 'Timea' (now an aka)

... and there was an id photo up for 'Emanuell'

its all very confusing... i still think that the most popular two name (i.e. christian & surname) should be used as the main id on the site even if it wasn't used as much as the single name identification - it would save a lot of confusion and chopping and changing

[jj]

Rob4 wrote:
> its all very confusing...
Just bad luck that those two IDs hadn't 'settled down' when
last you looked. Emanuell pics will appear after I or someone
else have uploaded info. on her her Private titles.

> i still think that the most popular
> two name (i.e. christian & surname) should be used as the main
> id on the site even if it wasn't used as much as the single
> name identification...
But a lot of models never get given 'porn-surnames'. Yes, it
means that eventually we'll end up with 'Kristina [2864]' etc.
but I see no practical way around the problem- and this solution
is easily the most logical. If it's any consolation bacteriologists
and entomologists, confronted with the explosion of newly-
recognised species in their respective specialisations, long ago
partially abandoned the hallowed Linnean binominal system
[Homo sapiens, Bos taurus, etc.] for an alphanumerically-
based classification.
I tend to agree with you about pragmatism versus popularity
and I'll bang the drum where I feel it's appropriate for a rarer
or superseded alias to replace a commoner but more 'problematic'
one [here, for example, first paragraph].
The chopping and changing is in a sense inevitable, as more
information becomes available. I often have to do considerable
digging to find out what ID a particular girl is now 'filed' under.
All part of the fun, I guess [img]http://www.egafd.com/forum/smileys/grin.gif[/img]

[Rob4]

jj you have hidden depths of knowledge - keep up the good work

[jj]

My hidden depth is that I have no hidden depth [img]http://www.egafd.com/forum/smileys/grin.gif[/img]
Promise you won't give me away.....