bezttina campbell?

[Bad Samaritan]

jj wrote:

> Bad Samaritan wrote:
> > When the recipient is a male, they call it femdom fetish and
> > push it outside of the mainstream.
>
> To further sexual equality, I'd be perfectly happy for the
> converse
> to be termed 'maledom fetish' and similarly shunted from the
> mainstream,
> into the obscurity it so richly deserves : -)
>

Many people think the same about anal, DP, facial, deep bj, which they see as sexual acts degrading women and should be pushed out of the mainstream, if not prohibited altogether.

[jj]

Bad Samaritan wrote:
> Many people think the same about anal, DP, facial, deep bj...

.... in which case they are totally anti-porn and therefore not
qualified to voice an opinion on the minutiae the various genres : -))

[jj]

Bad Samaritan wrote:
>.... when his work started to primarily target the American market.

... and he became boring, overnight : -)

[Bad Samaritan]

jj wrote:

> Bad Samaritan wrote:
> > Many people think the same about anal, DP, facial, deep bj...
>
> .... in which case they are totally anti-porn and therefore not
>
> qualified to voice an opinion on the minutiae the
> various genres : -))
>

Have you ever read Ovidie? She condemns all these (also bareback, for it threatens the health of female performers, and creampie naturally) and she's not anti-porn, a 'sex-positive feminist' most possibly.

[jj]

Bad Samaritan wrote:
> Have you ever read Ovidie?
I'd rather read Ovid, than the maunderings of that pretentious young
lass : -)
Having [regrettably] seen some of her output, both in front of and
behind the camera, I wouldn't categorise her as an 'opinion-former'
worth heeding. Her stuff leaves me completely cold.

> She condemns all these.... and she's not anti-porn....
A contradiction there, I think. Unless she redefines the word 'porn'
to suit her own preconceptions, which is then faulty logic.
I can't argue with her comments about health-risks- ANY exchange
of body-fluids is potentially dangerous- but I have pointed out here
previously that the risks are vastly exaggerated by industry pundits,
either through ignorance, or an agenda.

[Bad Samaritan]

jj wrote:

> Bad Samaritan wrote:
> > She condemns all these.... and she's not anti-porn....
> A contradiction there, I think. Unless she redefines the word
> 'porn'
> to suit her own preconceptions, which is then faulty logic.

I agree. Also she keeps talking about 'sublime violence' and Bataille is outdated, etc. She seems to have a bit of a confused mind.

[jj]

Bad Samaritan wrote:
She seems to have a bit of a confused mind.

I can sympathise with that : -))

[Bad Samaritan]

I don't want to be unjust to her albeit that 'confused mind' thing. She had studied philosophy and she is still very interested in it. She has some intriguing ideas, which bolster her aura. We all know that other porn girls are usually not very much into abstract thinking.

[jj]

Bad Samaritan wrote:
> We all know that other porn girls are usually not
> very much into abstract thinking.

All my ladies have plenty of time to philosophize, whilst staring
at the ceiling and stifling yawns : -)
Asia Carrera is a competent pianist, so at least you could have
apres-sex music- which would be much better than discussing
Schopenhauer : -;