Mr Editor,
I was browsing your board the other day and was taken by the marked resemblence between
entitled "A fine selection of Mary Millington pictures" by your esteemed correspondant Mr Hugh Jampton on October 31st and
entitled "Mary Millington-Galleries" by Mr Cornish Chris on November 2nd.
I wonder if they are in any way related?
Separated at birth?
Re: Separated at birth?
Sorry Hugh,s Agent, my mistake, I did scan down the board to see if these had been posted before, but dim old me must have missed the previous post. Eyesight is not all that good owing to years of self-abuse combined with too much peering through my eye-piece at assorted lovelies, in various stages of undress.
Anyway Mary Millington is worth a repost, if ever anybody was.
I Consider myself suitably chastised.
Cheers Cornish Chris.
Anyway Mary Millington is worth a repost, if ever anybody was.
I Consider myself suitably chastised.
Cheers Cornish Chris.
Re: Separated at birth?
Mr Chris
The Reverend Jampton ( oops, what a giveaway ) entirely understands the feelings of excitement and arousal that you must have experienced following the discovery of over 100 images of Ms Millington and her selection of toys.
You may consider yourself absolved.
The Reverend Jampton ( oops, what a giveaway ) entirely understands the feelings of excitement and arousal that you must have experienced following the discovery of over 100 images of Ms Millington and her selection of toys.
You may consider yourself absolved.
Re: Separated at birth?
actually, i was going to post the link earlier than hugh, but as it was taking so long to d/l from his overworked site i didn't get a chance, so there, poo to you, hugh:p