Grace aka Grace Cat is not credited in Das Perverse Faustfick-Festival.
Grace
She can be seen in the final row, the tattoo gives it away.
http://www.imagebam.com/image/0ef64737596500
http://www.imagebam.com/image/52c06a37596123
Das Perverse Faustfick-Festival
Re: Das Perverse Faustfick-Festival
That's just a compilation. The scenes are taken from various Magma titles.
Actresses include:
Anja [4]
Anja Juliette Laval (scene from Neue Sklaven f?r die Domina)
Grace (scene from Neue Sklaven f?r die Domina)
Lara [2] (scene from Tresen Schlampen)
Linda Logan (scene from Tresen Schlampen)
Nicoletta Blue (scenes from Tresen Schlampen)
...and very probably Lena Hernandez and Paola R?ve.
-
Ridley44Lev
- Posts: 215
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Das Perverse Faustfick-Festival
Thanks for the info. It is so frustrating that someone like me thinks this is a "new" title. 
Re: Das Perverse Faustfick-Festival
Your comment is about the only GOOD reason for the database to include
compilations- to inform the unwary purchaser*.
Current policy [with which, 4WIW, I wholeheartedly agree] is generally to
exclude them as an unnecessary distraction from the 'core business' of adding
new titles and updating existing ones.
* A case in point: I am hugely down on Swank/Defrancesco as a result of their
cynical policy of endlessly re-hashing scenes in titles that are purportedly 'new'
[the current record stands at one scene appearing in no less than FIVE different
flicks]. As egafd doesn't list many of their titles it's rather a moot point here-
but over on iafd these titles are all listed as NON-comps. I'm not holding iafd
particularly responsible, as they can only go with the info. they get given- and I
for one [given more free time than I currently have] could do more to untangle
the current morass]... in the end we have to fall back on the old saw:
caveat emptor; but as you say, it's often very tricky even for the relatively
experienced punter not to get caught out occasionally by these shysters.
compilations- to inform the unwary purchaser*.
Current policy [with which, 4WIW, I wholeheartedly agree] is generally to
exclude them as an unnecessary distraction from the 'core business' of adding
new titles and updating existing ones.
* A case in point: I am hugely down on Swank/Defrancesco as a result of their
cynical policy of endlessly re-hashing scenes in titles that are purportedly 'new'
[the current record stands at one scene appearing in no less than FIVE different
flicks]. As egafd doesn't list many of their titles it's rather a moot point here-
but over on iafd these titles are all listed as NON-comps. I'm not holding iafd
particularly responsible, as they can only go with the info. they get given- and I
for one [given more free time than I currently have] could do more to untangle
the current morass]... in the end we have to fall back on the old saw:
caveat emptor; but as you say, it's often very tricky even for the relatively
experienced punter not to get caught out occasionally by these shysters.
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."