attn. soljARis
attn. soljARis
Thanks for the info, but that name was removed at her request.
Re: attn. soljARis
I didn't think that could have been the case since her picture was included in her 'Nathalie Idoux' file until yesterday.
But now I see that also her picture is 'removed by request'. Probably it slipped away.
Anyway, this is just another case of how stupid some of these girls were. Appearing in a magazine printed in tens of thousands of copies under her real name, when her name was such a strange combination of french name + slavic surname, probably unique in the whole world. Any stalker could have tracked her down, even back then when there was no internet. What was she thinking?
But now I see that also her picture is 'removed by request'. Probably it slipped away.
Anyway, this is just another case of how stupid some of these girls were. Appearing in a magazine printed in tens of thousands of copies under her real name, when her name was such a strange combination of french name + slavic surname, probably unique in the whole world. Any stalker could have tracked her down, even back then when there was no internet. What was she thinking?
Re: attn. soljARis
Thanks for the understanding - of egafd if not for the models. 
The same applies to the aka for Tanya Valis BTW. That post would have been hidden in 2009 if it hadn't been overlooked. Sorry.
Maybe it's best to send such information via e-mail. Thanks.
The same applies to the aka for Tanya Valis BTW. That post would have been hidden in 2009 if it hadn't been overlooked. Sorry.
Maybe it's best to send such information via e-mail. Thanks.
Re: attn. soljARis
I am wondering about one aspect of all these matters.
While for the database itself the way you are behaving it's probably the best solution, since EGAFD can't rely on the same legal protections that IAFD or even more IMDB stand above, couldn't there be a different solution for the forum?
I mean, I know that it's possible for websites to have parts of their content not researchable by search engines. For instance there are parts of VEF, a website that deals with much of the same subject matters as EGAFD (though in a different way) that are absolutely not accessible through google and so don't show up if one of those overzealous 'privacy defenders' look for them through the engines.
If this is feasible, wouldn't it be better to make the forum - and just the forum - not searchable by external engines so that we can discuss here of whatever we want, including those petulant ladies?
While for the database itself the way you are behaving it's probably the best solution, since EGAFD can't rely on the same legal protections that IAFD or even more IMDB stand above, couldn't there be a different solution for the forum?
I mean, I know that it's possible for websites to have parts of their content not researchable by search engines. For instance there are parts of VEF, a website that deals with much of the same subject matters as EGAFD (though in a different way) that are absolutely not accessible through google and so don't show up if one of those overzealous 'privacy defenders' look for them through the engines.
If this is feasible, wouldn't it be better to make the forum - and just the forum - not searchable by external engines so that we can discuss here of whatever we want, including those petulant ladies?
Re: attn. soljARis
That's something that's beyond my technical competence, but it's certainly something to consider. Thanks.