XNK7118
I've seen both movies that are listed her entry and I think
those are two different girls.
XNK7118
Re: XNK7118
Didn't see the movie , but there is vef thread with all scenes and scene parings.
Claire looks to thin ... but well maybe she was on a BK diet. Pics are to small.
Claire looks to thin ... but well maybe she was on a BK diet. Pics are to small.
Re: XNK7118
some caps of xnk4782 from Charlene in Action:
[IMG]http://thumbnails114.imagebam.com/44526/df67c6445254233.jpg[/IMG]
More in the gallery
[IMG]http://thumbnails114.imagebam.com/44526/df67c6445254233.jpg[/IMG]
More in the gallery
Re: XNK7118
... "sent for further consultation".
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."
Re: XNK7118
De-merged, with notes added.
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."
Re: XNK7118
IMO those are different actresses.
[IMG]http://thumbnails114.imagebam.com/44529/d361b3445283298.jpg[/IMG]
Compare the areolas with deezers gallery. Boob size is also way different, she could have gotten a boob job, but she must have got really fat in the meantime and she doesn't look like a girl for a boob job. Mouth corner looks different too.
And she looks also older. MGM numbers are 88138 and 88263.
[IMG]http://thumbnails114.imagebam.com/44529/d361b3445283298.jpg[/IMG]
Compare the areolas with deezers gallery. Boob size is also way different, she could have gotten a boob job, but she must have got really fat in the meantime and she doesn't look like a girl for a boob job. Mouth corner looks different too.
And she looks also older. MGM numbers are 88138 and 88263.
Re: XNK7118
lgwin wrote:
> MGM numbers are 88138 and 88263.
Which is which?
> MGM numbers are 88138 and 88263.
Which is which?
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."
Re: XNK7118
lgwin wrote:
>>Compare the areolas ...
It's cold outside, so they shrinked:-)
lgwin wrote:
>>Boob size is also way different, she could have gotten a boob job
No, I saw a clip with this scene. Definitly natural breasts in both films.
lgwin wrote:
>>but she must have got really fat
XNK7118 is definitly more well-rounded. But, why not. Weight changes.
lgwin wrote:
>>Mouth corner looks different too.
Agree!
lgwin wrote:
>>And she looks also older.
You mean XNK4782? Only a little bit, but less weigth often leads to older
looking face.
>>Compare the areolas ...
It's cold outside, so they shrinked:-)
lgwin wrote:
>>Boob size is also way different, she could have gotten a boob job
No, I saw a clip with this scene. Definitly natural breasts in both films.
lgwin wrote:
>>but she must have got really fat
XNK7118 is definitly more well-rounded. But, why not. Weight changes.
lgwin wrote:
>>Mouth corner looks different too.
Agree!
lgwin wrote:
>>And she looks also older.
You mean XNK4782? Only a little bit, but less weigth often leads to older
looking face.
Re: XNK7118
At the risk of prolonging even further this discussion, I repeat:
"De-merged, with notes added".
"De-merged, with notes added".
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."
Re: XNK7118
"Charlene in Action" is the older movie - sorry I thought it was obvious.
I think I have most of magma vhs covers with numbers.
Can try to create a list from it but I'd have to find a way to parse the file names and they are not always correct.
I think I have most of magma vhs covers with numbers.
Can try to create a list from it but I'd have to find a way to parse the file names and they are not always correct.