Hi Richard
Thanx very much for the interest.
I am not sure where your interest lies whether its just Playboy TV before 11 or TAC afterwards but my post was following last weekends New Presenters Weekend on TAC.
I use Annanova for listings which only stated 'Presenters weekend'. I e-mailled TAC asking for a detailed breakdown and was delighted at the speedy reply with that information a few days before the off.
I am not a night owl and record what I want to watch thats shown after i am fast asleep to watch at what is for me more wakeful time.
A programme not in those schedules was inserted on Sunday and the programmes afterwards ran later as a result. That screwed up my recording. Thats the sort of thing that undoes the goodwil of being sent the schedules.
So please publish details of not only the programmes but the girls featured in each as there is too little proper accreditation of the performers.
Hope this helps
Cheers
Frank
O/T Full Contact Girls
-
Joe A
Re: O/T Full Contact Girls
To: Anyone at Playboy tv
Three of us commented about how we as either content producers or with the ability to supply girls to the Playboy channels were the first to post and we all complained of the staffs behaviour in lack of replies.
I would have expected an email by now specially as I pointed Jeremy Yates in this direction. Maybe the Playboy organisation uses the UK channels as a tax write off..LOL.
Jeremy or one of your minions why haven't you responded to the problem caused by your producer who lied to you about the Oriental models being unavailable when one who he phoned and said she was available, hasn't had another call from him as he promised to do the next day. If you want to have an Indian or Oriental series I hope you find the models.. Mine aren't waiting for anyone to call them when they can be bothered to, specially when I was told you wanted to film the series asap !!
I did my bit but your staff did nothing.. I've dragged this on to a public board as trying to work out the problems in private doesn't seem to have worked.
You have the email address on our three original posts so why not send us your reply in private.. I'm sure Jason and Chris would also like to hear from you.
Three of us commented about how we as either content producers or with the ability to supply girls to the Playboy channels were the first to post and we all complained of the staffs behaviour in lack of replies.
I would have expected an email by now specially as I pointed Jeremy Yates in this direction. Maybe the Playboy organisation uses the UK channels as a tax write off..LOL.
Jeremy or one of your minions why haven't you responded to the problem caused by your producer who lied to you about the Oriental models being unavailable when one who he phoned and said she was available, hasn't had another call from him as he promised to do the next day. If you want to have an Indian or Oriental series I hope you find the models.. Mine aren't waiting for anyone to call them when they can be bothered to, specially when I was told you wanted to film the series asap !!
I did my bit but your staff did nothing.. I've dragged this on to a public board as trying to work out the problems in private doesn't seem to have worked.
You have the email address on our three original posts so why not send us your reply in private.. I'm sure Jason and Chris would also like to hear from you.
-
Jeremy
Re: O/T Full Contact Girls
A very brief response for now:
Joe - I'm sorry I can't provide you with a quicker reply, but you will get a response, so no need to rant here! I said I'd get back to you, and you said OK take your time (12 Nov).
Forumites, I know, will appreciate that there'll be another side to the story and draw their own conclusions, but I don't intend to go into it on the forum.
Jason and Chris, I'll drop you both an email next week.
Jeremy
Joe - I'm sorry I can't provide you with a quicker reply, but you will get a response, so no need to rant here! I said I'd get back to you, and you said OK take your time (12 Nov).
Forumites, I know, will appreciate that there'll be another side to the story and draw their own conclusions, but I don't intend to go into it on the forum.
Jason and Chris, I'll drop you both an email next week.
Jeremy
-
Bubba
The Punters Opinion
Richard,
Can I dare to answer your question as it was originally intended? "What do British punters think of the Playboy channel." as opposed to who's been professionally shafted by a multi-billion dollar empire lately.
Word on the street (pay close attention) Playboy = artificial girls, artifical settings, artificial sex.
Does anyone seriously want to pay good money to watch 'soft core' content that looks like it was generated by a Playstation?
And as you're asking for opinions on American porn no holds barred - then it's safe to say I can comment honestly and frankly. It sucks (to coin an Americanism) and not in the way we'd all like either.
Why do so many American adult performers think humungous breast implants and wearing more make-up than Coco the clown is remotely erotic? Watching a couple of plastic American 'lesbians' rolling around, screaming "You like that?...Nyuh!....Nyuh...you like that!!!" over and over to an MTV beat is about as sexually fulfilling as sex with household appliances. But then household appliances tend to be less artifical looking then most USA porn stars.
I'm sure this won't change your programming a jot, but I thought I'd butt in as a punter rather than a proprieter.
Can I dare to answer your question as it was originally intended? "What do British punters think of the Playboy channel." as opposed to who's been professionally shafted by a multi-billion dollar empire lately.
Word on the street (pay close attention) Playboy = artificial girls, artifical settings, artificial sex.
Does anyone seriously want to pay good money to watch 'soft core' content that looks like it was generated by a Playstation?
And as you're asking for opinions on American porn no holds barred - then it's safe to say I can comment honestly and frankly. It sucks (to coin an Americanism) and not in the way we'd all like either.
Why do so many American adult performers think humungous breast implants and wearing more make-up than Coco the clown is remotely erotic? Watching a couple of plastic American 'lesbians' rolling around, screaming "You like that?...Nyuh!....Nyuh...you like that!!!" over and over to an MTV beat is about as sexually fulfilling as sex with household appliances. But then household appliances tend to be less artifical looking then most USA porn stars.
I'm sure this won't change your programming a jot, but I thought I'd butt in as a punter rather than a proprieter.
-
Richard Ings
Re: The Punters Opinion
Thanks, this sort of confirms many people's expectations of the channel, but my original point about "Full Contact Girls" is that it is none of these things.
So I really wanted an insider punter's view - do people here watch it and hate it because it fulfils the stereotype? Do people like it because it fulfils this stereotype? Or do people recognise that there is more to it than the stereotype? (There are elements of truth in any stereotype, but I hope that people make their own judgements based on what they have seen not what they have heard or believe to be true).
Cheers
Richard
So I really wanted an insider punter's view - do people here watch it and hate it because it fulfils the stereotype? Do people like it because it fulfils this stereotype? Or do people recognise that there is more to it than the stereotype? (There are elements of truth in any stereotype, but I hope that people make their own judgements based on what they have seen not what they have heard or believe to be true).
Cheers
Richard