Film

[jj]

Johray1 wrote:
> Would it be "proper" to state:
> "Released in 2006; containing material from ca. 2002-2004"?

For the db it would have to be the other way round. The entry-tool really
only allows for one specfic date or a "c. xxxx" [we're also tryng to eliminate
vague entries like 'early 2000s']. It's this date that appears after the title
in the girls' filmos. Any subsequent DVD-release date is usually added in the
Film Notes.

[jj]

She seems familiar.
BTW, is she non=sex here?

[Johray1]

jj wrote:
> She seems familiar.
> BTW, is she non=sex here?
----------------------------------------------
Yes, completely non-sex.
She appears three times for less than a minute and as even the
camera-man seems to fear her grittiness, he always keeps his distance...

I'd like to give more infos, but I haven't seen her (knowingly) in any other
scene/film.
Still it'd be unlikely to have one amateur in a cast of more or less
noted actors/actresses... !hmmm!

[Johray1]

jj wrote:
> Johray1 wrote:
> > Would it be "proper" to state:
> > "Released in 2006; containing material from ca. 2002-2004"?
> For the db it would have to be the other way round. The
> entry-tool really only allows for one specfic date or a "c. xxxx" [we're also
> tryng to eliminate vague entries like 'early 2000s']. It's this date that appears
> after the title in the girls' filmos. Any subsequent DVD-release date is
> usually added in the Film Notes.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Alright, I see.
If release-date and material shouldn't coordinate and I see only vague options
regarding the date of recording... I would indicate "Unknown" as "Year"
and leave it to the forum to make a final-decision, right?!
Or I'll state the "official" year and would remark if and why I question it, alright?!

[jj]

Johray1 wrote:
> If release-date and material shouldn't coordinate ....

All that's fine.
If you're lucky some hardworking admin may even check [img]http://www.egafd.com/forum/smileys/whistle.gif[/img][img]http://www.egafd.com/forum/smileys/innocent.gif[/img]

[Johray1]

jj wrote:

> Johray1 wrote:
> > If release-date and material shouldn't coordinate ....>
> All that's fine.
> If you're lucky some hardworking admin may even check
> [img]http://www.egafd.com/forum/smileys/whistle.gif[/img][img]http://www.egafd.com/forum/smileys/innocent.gif[/img]
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master Jay; I know you do! !happy!
Thanks!

PS: I try to "re-pay" you with these beautifully-structured, care-free
"reviews" of mine...

!grin!

Cheers! !drink!

[jj]

Thanks.

[Johray1]

Oh, thanks! !happy!
And as I hate to spoil the party, I decided not to feel confused
about the "Maga bizarr" or alternating "Magma bizarr" film-indications! !blush!

Maga bizarr:




Magma bizarr:


--------------------------------------------------------------------
Sorry
!sad!

[jj]

There're enough films waiting already without my inventing new ones.
Fixed (I hope).

[Johray1]

jj wrote:

> There're enough films waiting already without my inventing new
> ones.
> Fixed (I hope).
------------------------------------------------------------
The 1st three are completely fixed!!thumbsup!

Only Martina is still "wrong"
Her two "Pension Olga"- gallery pics start after
"Drakonische Ma?nahmen" and end before "Au-Pair Affair"