Just in case this one possibly has been "buried" in-between
the many posts surrounding it...
Don't hope it to be simply "inappropriate"... !doh!
The obviously "lost" review?!
Re: The obviously "lost" review?!
My restraining-order prohibits me from being within 500m of any Girl
Guides or Young Pioneers,.
Guides or Young Pioneers,.
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."
Re: The obviously "lost" review?!
jj wrote:
> My restraining-order prohibits me from being within 500m of any
> Girl > Guides or Young Pioneers,.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Actually there aren't any... they just play them...
I don't really understand.... sorry...
> My restraining-order prohibits me from being within 500m of any
> Girl > Guides or Young Pioneers,.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Actually there aren't any... they just play them...
I don't really understand.... sorry...
Re: The obviously "lost" review?!
Errr... I'm leaving this one to Alec : -)
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."
Re: The obviously "lost" review?!
jj wrote:
> Errr... I'm leaving this one to Alec : -)
------------------------------------------------
Thanks.
Alec is great and appears to have a huge knowledge about russian girls !happy!
Still it may cause inconveniences, I fear... !sad!
But, I think one has to start somewhere to make obscurities less obscure, right?!
> Errr... I'm leaving this one to Alec : -)
------------------------------------------------
Thanks.
Alec is great and appears to have a huge knowledge about russian girls !happy!
Still it may cause inconveniences, I fear... !sad!
But, I think one has to start somewhere to make obscurities less obscure, right?!
Re: The obviously "lost" review?!
Johray1 wrote:
> Alec is great
Yes he is.
> and appears to have a huge knowledge about russian girls
.... he does, now....
> But, I think one has to start somewhere to make obscurities
> less obscure, right?
We but see "through a glass, darkly".
> Alec is great
Yes he is.
> and appears to have a huge knowledge about russian girls
.... he does, now....
> But, I think one has to start somewhere to make obscurities
> less obscure, right?
We but see "through a glass, darkly".
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."
Re: The obviously "lost" review?!
jj wrote:
> Johray1 wrote:
> > Alec is great
> Yes he is.
> > and appears to have a huge knowledge about russian girls
> .... he does, now....
>
>
> > But, I think one has to start somewhere to make obscurities
> > less obscure, right?
> We but see "through a glass, darkly"
----------------------------------
I fully understand; honestly...
Seeing this film the first time... I only could tell
Sneila, Leilas and Viktorija to be in the cast.
Sonia [13] became apparent a little later...
The rest made me (2-3 still do) think "Who the f**k are they??!"
So, I am truly aware of the difficulties and will of course be supportive
as far as I can if things need clearance... whatever...etc...
!cool!
> Johray1 wrote:
> > Alec is great
> Yes he is.
> > and appears to have a huge knowledge about russian girls
> .... he does, now....
>
>
> > But, I think one has to start somewhere to make obscurities
> > less obscure, right?
> We but see "through a glass, darkly"
----------------------------------
I fully understand; honestly...
Seeing this film the first time... I only could tell
Sneila, Leilas and Viktorija to be in the cast.
Sonia [13] became apparent a little later...
The rest made me (2-3 still do) think "Who the f**k are they??!"
So, I am truly aware of the difficulties and will of course be supportive
as far as I can if things need clearance... whatever...etc...
!cool!
Re: The obviously "lost" review?!
jj wrote:
>>We but see "through a glass, darkly"
..."; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known."
>>We but see "through a glass, darkly"
..."; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known."
Re: The obviously "lost" review?!
deezer wrote:
> jj wrote:
> >>We but see "through a glass, darkly"
>
> ..."; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall
> I know even as also I am known."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
??? !confused!
> jj wrote:
> >>We but see "through a glass, darkly"
>
> ..."; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall
> I know even as also I am known."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
??? !confused!
Re: The obviously "lost" review?!
Pair of Sunday-School rejects, that's us : 0-)
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."