XNK8056

This forum is intended for the discussion and sharing of information on the topic of Continental European female performers in hard-core adult films and related matters.
Post Reply
Dx.One
Posts: 993
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

XNK8056

Post by Dx.One »

XNK8056

Looks like some pics ended up in the wrong gallery.

The pics in 8056's gallery belong to XNK1846.

There is a girl in red underwear in that scene. I assume she was supposed to be XNK8056.
alec
Posts: 9874
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2019 1:22 pm

Re: XNK8056

Post by alec »

I found it difficult to decide which was XNK1846.

I've changed 8056 to the girl in red underwear, though if you hadn't mentioned the red underwear, I wouldn't have noticed from my caps.

Is it correct now?
Dx.One
Posts: 993
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: XNK8056

Post by Dx.One »

>>Is it correct now?
I think so.

BTW: somebody on VEF suggested that XNK8056 and XNK8057 are Manya and Susan Turner (Emmanuelle Kane).
But I'm not really familiar with Manya and just from the caps I can't tell if the other girl is really Susan Turner.
alec
Posts: 9874
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2019 1:22 pm

Re: XNK8056

Post by alec »

Dx One wrote:

> >>Is it correct now?
> I think so.

Thanks.

>
> BTW: somebody on VEF suggested that XNK8056 and XNK8057 are
> Manya
> and Susan Turner
> (Emmanuelle
> Kane
).
> But I'm not really familiar with Manya and just from the caps I
> can't tell if the other girl is really Susan Turner.

I'm not greatly familiar with Manya either, but the new 8056 does look familiar.
jj
Posts: 28236
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: XNK8056

Post by jj »

Dx One wrote:
> BTW: somebody on VEF suggested that XNK8056 and XNK8057 are
> Manya
> and Susan Turner
> (Emmanuelle
> Kane
).

Those were my exact thoughts.
I'm not massively familiar with the younger Manya but it's worth adding
a note. 1846: I'd want to see the film or failing that, more caps.

"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
jj
Posts: 28236
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: XNK8056

Post by jj »

jj wrote:
> I'm not massively familiar with the younger Manya but it's
> worth adding a note.
Side-by-sides of the distinctive moles in Manya and 8056:
[IMG]http://img164.imagevenue.com/loc38/th_09780_1_123_38lo.jpg[/IMG][IMG]http://img163.imagevenue.com/loc139/th_09781_1a_123_139lo.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]http://img255.imagevenue.com/loc219/th_09782_2_123_219lo.jpg[/IMG][IMG]http://img194.imagevenue.com/loc148/th_09784_2a_123_148lo.jpg[/IMG]
While I can't illustrate a 1-to-1 correspondence (camera-angles etc.)
having seen the film now I'm sure.


> 1846: I'd want to see the film or failing that, more caps.
Having seen it, I'm pretty sure it's EK.

"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
Dx.One
Posts: 993
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: XNK8056

Post by Dx.One »

JJ wrote:
>> 1846: I'd want to see the film or failing that, more caps.
>>Having seen it, I'm pretty sure it's EK.

Ehm... I guess you mean 8057 and not 1846.
I've seen 1846 in several movies. That's certainly not EK.
jj
Posts: 28236
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: XNK8056

Post by jj »

Dx One wrote:
> Ehm... I guess you mean 8057 and not 1846
Yes. Senility again : -)

"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
Post Reply