Remind yourself of what the FAQ says about personal abuse.
We all know of your grudge against the Adult Channel by now. Your criticisms are boring because they are never constructive, but the main reason your posts were removed is because of personal attacks on the presenters. The fact that your posts are anonymous doens't help them to remain up either.
Now I expect you'll accuse us of bias. So be it.
Sasbifan, your post was response to his which meant it automatically disappeared. Otherwise it would have remained up as criticism of TAC is not banned per se.
Peter's post also autmatically disappeared.
attn Mr Whippy
-
Mr Whippy
Re: attn Mr Whippy
Point taken. Have you ever thought of making this forum a private members club? Where only people who work in the porn industry can talk amongst themselves and rant about how nasty the regulators are?
No criticism equals more crap on British sat channels.
Due to geographical reasons and local interference from tall buildings and trees not all of us can get the HC signals from other satellites so we have to put up with TAC etc.
No criticism equals more crap on British sat channels.
Due to geographical reasons and local interference from tall buildings and trees not all of us can get the HC signals from other satellites so we have to put up with TAC etc.
-
alec
Re: attn Mr Whippy
No, the point was evidently NOT taken.
There's a difference between constructive criticism and personal abuse, plus the same needle-stuck-in-the-groove ranting repeated ad nauseam. I finally got tired of it. If you don't like that, then piss off elsewhere.
There's a difference between constructive criticism and personal abuse, plus the same needle-stuck-in-the-groove ranting repeated ad nauseam. I finally got tired of it. If you don't like that, then piss off elsewhere.