Porn mags

A read-only and searchable archive of posts made to the BGAFD forum from 11/08/2000 to 14/03/2003.
Locked
Wilbert

Porn mags

Post by Wilbert »

Anyone else think porn mags aint as good as they used to be? Espesially Paul Raymond ones. I used to get Escort and Razzle but they're so bland now. They're a bit harder than 6 or 7 years ago but not as enjoyable.
buttsie

o/t Re: Porn mags

Post by buttsie »

Haven't bought them for eons but have seen reviews at

of most of the major publications....Americans headlining Mayfair....says it all to me

Don't like em....don't buy em I say

cheers
B...OZ
megaton

Re: o/t Re: Porn mags

Post by megaton »

Not enough brits in them too many yanks and europeans birds. Not that i'm complaining but they are in every magazine globally.
That's probably less and less people are buying them and models disappear after a year or go into porn.

I say buy British, get British.

Merry Xmas.
Lightningboy

Re: o/t Re: Porn mags

Post by Lightningboy »

The standard has slipped over the last few years...look at Whitehouse for instance...it used to feature the likes of Debbie Corrigan,Teresa May,Charmaine Sinclair and Nikki Kennedy on a regular basis...it now boasts full h/c shoots but it's full of european models...i want to see your page 3 /daily sport regulars getting down to it...also i don't think there are that many new gorgeous brits around at the moment (apart from Vikki Thomas,Jennai,jordan and Tara King)...i can't see them appearing in these sort of mags though(unfortunately!!)
monkeyman

Re: o/t Re: Porn mags

Post by monkeyman »

I think the internet has kind of killed the thrill of a porno mag. How many pages a magazine got? compared to infinity online. Online porn is more of a chore though at times. Besides we all prefer the stuff we grew up flicking through when we were younger. It's the same with Star Wars with our generation. It's the original trilogy or the prequels. I just love the whole Star Wars galaxy. Porn is no different. That's me making some sort of ass backward comparison, not some kind of desire to see Jar Jar Binks get hammered in the keyster by some six headed beast. Well, now hold on just a minute......
steve56

Re: o/t Re: Porn mags

Post by steve56 »

iprefer the mid 70s ,80s editions.
Paul Garfield

Re: Porn mags

Post by Paul Garfield »

Hi All,

I've read your comments with interest and, as the Editor of Razzle, thought that I might be able to add something! I take onboard your comments, but there are a couple of things that I'd like to point out. First off, as happy as I am to print true, blue British birds in Razzle, at the end of the day, I just want to feature the hottest women I can find - whether they are British, American, Czech or whatever. As has been pointed out, a lot of 'name' British models wouldn't even consider appearing in Razzle, so I just try to concentrate on the most attractive women I can find. We are seeing an increase in the numbers of British girls who are willing to disrobe, and that'll be reflected in the sets we print over the coming months. At the end of the day, from my point of view, it's all about keeping the mag looking hot, but I've spoken to Woodgnome and I'll be posting details of British models who are appearing in forthcoming issues.
As for the issue of online porn, I think that although it gives people more choice, there are still too many rip-off sites, and at the end of the day, sometimes it's just more convenient to have a decent mag. The biggest problem for traditional top shelf magazines is that there are so many titles out there - when you go in a lot of smaller newsagents (rather than the chains) you see, literally, dozens of mags. Which means that all too often we get lost in the crammed top shelf. Still, I shouldn't complain too much - I've just got a cracking set of Andrea Spinks for a future issue, and you should see this lovely Yorkshire lass who's just sent me some snaps?

Merry XXX-mas,

Paul
Topshelf (magazines)

Re: Porn mags

Post by Topshelf (magazines) »

Hi all,
First time I've posted here, but I'd thought I'd add my 2 cents.. I don't know how many people here have visited my site, (designed by phil), looks dead like this one only with brit girls girls in mags not films. I personly think the british mag scene has gone down hill since the H/C came into action with the usual suspects apearing monthly, M.Thorne, R.Lee, C.Barry, J.Whitehouse... etc. I admit that times have got to move on, and the above though are nice looking girls but have nothing to the likes of Teresa May, Nikki Kennedy, Vida, Joanne Guest (making a come back of some sort), ect... i could go on but you get the point. Call me old fashoned but I'd still rather see a nice non H/C shoot with the later girls than the "now regulars" getting shagged or with dildos. As for the foreign "head band league" (you know the german girls with the silly bright coloured headbands)they are nothing but damn ugly looking page fillers. To be fair to Paul Garfield's magazine I can't say I ever take a look at it, but I'd be interested to know if his sales would rise if for 1 issue he placed a mass of the old brits than his current content. I think I own 2 Razzles.. though not mentioned on my site. I think GSP release a new "glossy" title weekly by the looks of things, all presently having L.D.McKenzie in H/C action... well thats my view as a magman.
Happy new year to you all, I'll go crawl back under my rock.

Tops
magmanalso

Re: Porn mags

Post by magmanalso »

complete b,,,,,,s
lets not even start the teresa may thing
i think uk mags are looking the best they ever have at the moment
with thanks to the likes of the girls you mentioned at the top of your posting and editors moving with the times
who wants to see the same old soft crap of american girls
sorry but you better get back under your stone
Locked