short film for "Destricted".

The 'Promotions' forum is for the posting of promotional material relating to the British adult entertainment industry, as well as the seeking and commissioning of work by models and producers working in the British adult entertainment industry.
popside
Posts: 46
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: short film for "Destricted".

Post by popside »

Hi Josephine

I have sent you an email.

Regards

James
popside
Posts: 46
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: short film for "Destricted".

Post by popside »

Hi

Thanks to everybody for their feedback, especially Andy Ide....for the positive feedback!!! !thumbsup!

I will take on board what everyone has said.....I am still gonna do it regardless and if it turns out crap......well at least I've had a go.

Cheers

James
planeterotica
Posts: 7093
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: short film for "Destricted".

Post by planeterotica »

I caught this same post on the Shooters site and did wonder abot having a go, but i was thinking more in terms of Erotic Art as opposed to full blown porn, what has surprised me though is that shooters allow these post because once just the mention of porn or nudity would have got you kicked off and lately you have been getting the F and C words on there, how times have changed!love!


one eyed jack
Posts: 12418
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: short film for "Destricted".

Post by one eyed jack »

I have to agree with Jonone Andy..then again I can agree with you also that poor old popside got it in the teeth for dare mentioning trying something different.

Thing is you can still be arty and do porn too..Look at Trevor Watsons stuff...isnt some fetish stuff considered arty?

But lets face it, if you were to get overly arty all the time a lot of people just wouldnt get it and dismiss it as bollocks anyway....from performers to the end consumer who just ultimately want to bang one out watching a pretty girl getting fucked...Take from that what you will. From that you can make many variations from basic all out porn to leftfield arty. It just depends if you make any money on it if it sells and ultimately isnt that what we are in the business of doing? Making a living?

Most artists have died starving. I would love to take the time out to do something arty but I'm so busy with stuff these days it wouldnt be possible right now.

Besides where does one draw the line with 'arty' porn?

www.realcouples.com
www.onemanbanned.com
www.linkmojo.me/realcouples
www.twitter.com/realcouples
www.facebook.com/realcouples
one eyed jack
Posts: 12418
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: short film for "Destricted".

Post by one eyed jack »

I'm going to take a cyncial view on this as well Andy...Destricteds aims may have been altruistic in its intentions but I think for the majority of people who bought it was simply to see hard sex, no matter what context it was shot in. To some its still a blow job and a cock in pussy....Bzzzzt fast forward to the next juicy bit and a-b loop that.

Well, thats what I think anyway. Then some could also see it as a challenge to flout the rules by arguing a case that its art as we've seen with some films like Baise Moi, Irreversible and Romance becuase it is a feature depicting sex acts within the context of a story.

At least the Del Boy porn you refer to is what it is in all its honesty and doesnt play on being pretentious and anything other than what it is.

www.realcouples.com
www.onemanbanned.com
www.linkmojo.me/realcouples
www.twitter.com/realcouples
www.facebook.com/realcouples
mark cremona
Posts: 549
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: short film for "Destricted".

Post by mark cremona »

Im not sure if your comments Terry are designed to make those who want to do something other than 'Del Boy porn' feel like they are wasting their time ?

Is it so wrong to try to push the boundries of acceptability ? particularly in regards to Pornography.

hands up those who found the anal rape scene in Irreversible erotic ?

was it Art or Pornography ? and if it was 'Art' was it 'Pretentious' or was it just a titillating visual for someone to bang one out ?

personally it made me sick and was impossible to watch all the way thru without feeling nauseated, so for me it was 'Art' because it affected my response in a way that was unrelated to a sexual reaction.

babestationx.tv
babestationxtremeblog.com
latexotica.com
Jonone
Posts: 2939
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: short film for "Destricted".

Post by Jonone »

There is a graphic on the shootingpeople site of the Destricted dvd which suggests that it is being marketed in exactly the same way as Madonna's 'Sex' book was about 15 years ago - in a plain silver shrinkwrap. This isn't guerilla or underground film-making but a project which trades off the reputations of Larry Clark and Sam Taylor-Wood.

I'm not saying that the films aren't worthwhile, but let's not delude ourselves that the commercial imperatives and motivations were fundamentally different from those of any one-man-band porn producer. It's merely aimed at a different market segment for whom 'art' is the added value and the 'unique sales proposition'.
one eyed jack
Posts: 12418
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: short film for "Destricted".

Post by one eyed jack »

Mark wrote:
Im not sure if your comments Terry are designed to make those who want to do something other than 'Del Boy porn' feel like they are wasting their time ?

Not at all Mark. I applaud anyones efforts to do something different, but I think the bourgoise opinions shouldnt be at the expense of the man making his home made effort. The Del Boy of today might not have found his style right now and may end up being the next....Martin Scorsese of porn for all we know.Its a free market for anyone who gets into it with a mobile phone these days and you cant stop it. No one can. Producers might try to by closing ranks but the internet is the place that will give rise to anyone with talent (or not).

www.realcouples.com
www.onemanbanned.com
www.linkmojo.me/realcouples
www.twitter.com/realcouples
www.facebook.com/realcouples
one eyed jack
Posts: 12418
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: short film for "Destricted".

Post by one eyed jack »

Mark, with reference to your comments about Irreversible, I have to admit it made me feel uncomfortable also. I've watched it several times as i think its a head rush of a movie, especially the bit in the begiinging withthe loud droning sound and guy who gets bludgeoned to death with a fire extinguisher. It definitely evokes a distubeing feeling and a range of emotions watching it but as for the anal rape scene i have to quote one girl who watched it with me as saying:

'I must be sick, this is making my pussy wet!' (No I didnt get a shag out of it either) I shit you not Mark , I was shocked! Thats art for you mate. Provocative and evokes something deep within the individual.

The only thing she didnt like was when Monica got a severe punching afterwards....Sorry for the spoiler folks!

www.realcouples.com
www.onemanbanned.com
www.linkmojo.me/realcouples
www.twitter.com/realcouples
www.facebook.com/realcouples
mark cremona
Posts: 549
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: short film for "Destricted".

Post by mark cremona »

Hi Terry
point taken in your comments, I agree with your observations regarding bourgoise opinions, and, frankly I find the term 'Del Boy Porn' to be offensive in that it belittles the efforts of the working man which is why I put it in quotation marks, although Im sure Andi didn't mean it to be demeaning.

lol ! yes Irreversible was a head rush, thinking now about the comments your lady friend made, reminds me of papers I have read regarding women and 'rape fantasies' apparently they perceive such stimuli in a very different way to ourselves, its a pity you didn't get a shag out of it tho !


maybe I will see you in Berlin Terry ?

all the best

Mark

babestationx.tv
babestationxtremeblog.com
latexotica.com
Locked