Turning Raw into JPG (using automated batch action

[puretotty]

When can you get up to Milton Keynes to give me lessons... ?50 a hour sounds fine if you possess Jedi Ninja skills...

[JB]

puretotty wrote:

> When can you get up to Milton Keynes to give me lessons... ?50
> a hour sounds fine if you possess Jedi Ninja skills...

My Jedi Ninja skills probably aren't strong enough to take me to Milton Keyens, but If you're serious and fancy a trip down to the right end of the M1, drop me a message. Better give me time to install v2.0 first though and play with the new features! !happy!

[puretotty]

Thanks all for your input into this discussion, I did wonder how much it would get discussed on a porn forum lol...

I do want to also improve the general quality of the images I shoot... I seem to always get a little too much yellow tinge in my pics... but I found out my temp was set to 6300 ! Now put it down to 4300 and using manual WB instead of the pre set ones

I think the combination of shooting a better original image in RAW and then editing in LightRoom or even Camera Raw will improve the look of my work...

[kiNky erOtica]

I shoot in both, JPG & RAW on everything I shoot, not just Glamour (I like a bit of Lanscape)
To be honest I hardley every touch raw when it comes to glamour, I just use the jpg files, but in case of some fuck ups then i can revert to raw.
The only problem is file size per picture is roughly tripled on raw...

[M_IMAGE]

Hi

Been using LightRoom for some time and upgarded to version 2.0 - if I can help happy to come over, but will cost you a brew of tea and cheese sandwich!!

[JB]

M_IMAGE wrote:

> Been using LightRoom for some time and upgarded to version 2.0
> - if I can help happy to come over, but will cost you a brew of
> tea and cheese sandwich!!

Damn I've been undercut! !tears!

[rgb]

ecucamman wrote:

> If you have Canons Digital Photo Professional programme with
> your camera, try using that,

I've had the CD for this sitting on my shelf for yonks and never bothered installing it until now...
but, yes, it's a very useful little program for batch processing, isn't it !thumbsup!

[Studio3]

Good point, I too forgot to mention that Canon's Digital Photo Professional is worth a look (especially since it's a freebie), as it's also got some good features and is particularly useful for batch resizing, which it does very efficiently and is smart enough to identify portrait and landscape shots and resize them accordingly, unlike some programs. Even if I am using photoshop for most jobs, I often resize sets in DPP for web or sample purposes, though admittedly the webgallery function in photoshop is also pretty good in this respect.

[puretotty]

Hey Dude... about to mail you now

[M_IMAGE]

Hi did you get my email?