Model no show due to hangover

[one eyed jack]

Harry, my opinion was based purely on your private message to me otherwise I was in agreement a no show was a no show but elements of your message lead me to believe that you just wanted to shag her under the guise of it being work

There are more pertinent forums for that kind of thing.

So are we to allow everyone to post if a girl changeds her mind for what appears to be a private paid shag to affect her standing with professional producers?

Its not in our interest to black list and run models out of th ebusiness unless we know for sure the person complaining has a vlaid standingin the producing community. Just because you pay for a shag and point a camera doesnt make you a producer. otherwise every bloke who points a mobile phone at a drunk girl sucking his dick on a Friday night is a producer too and I think thats where our misunderstanding goes.

I've nothing against you wanting to shag girls who do porn but dont be too surprised if they let you down and change their minds if they dont consider you professional if you just use adultwork to sell your wares.

As for UKAP being a cartel, dont be petty dude. You are disappointed with me. Not UKAP. If I had my way your post would be deleted but it isnt. I just commented on it because you posted there. You messaged me privately and I relayed these same thoughts to you.

[one eyed jack]

hary , unles you know who are members of UKAP I would strongly suggest you dont bring them up. Your beef is with me. Lets keep it on topic shall we.
I write to you as myself. Not under the guise of UKAP.

You wrote:

I do this for my own pleasure not for profit so maybe my motives are different to your average producer / film maker. I have no interest in getting product onto Television X or DVD, like a number of people on the BGAFD, the internet can be used to show photos.

I rest my case !happy!

Producers openly do it for profit. Alexa has never let anyone down that I know of and I was one of the few she started out with so I am not interested in taking someone who has no plans to profit but just enjoy over ruining her standing with companies whose interest it is to profit.

I totally understand you feel burned on the let down but do you really give a shit when professional producers get let down?

Really?

[one eyed jack]

Please ask Yazmin for the two years of certs I brought to her "World Cup Wank" shoot.

So you shag porn stars for a hobby?

Fair play to you. If ***** is the first one that let you down then you've had a good track record so far.

We shouldnt even be taking this so far for the fact you even admitted she text you afternot showing.

It seems to me you are mad because she changed her mind more than the loss of money and has pissed you off to the point of revenge. I am not interested in being party to personal vengeance.

If I was in your shoes i would just put it down to experience. You would have had a better standing if she ignored you altogether as my next step would be to contact her to respond with a reason...But she gave you that already. Whether its true or not, you did get a personal response for her no show.

For the record I can totally understand why forums dont allow naming and shaming.

Anyway Harry what difference does it make to you what I think anyway? The post is still there. I've voiced my concern that it should be removed as irrelevant so maybe you should go suck up to the UKAP cartel eh?

[a m playlist]

one eyed jack wrote:
>
> Producers openly do it for profit. Alexa has never let anyone
> down that I know of and I was one of the few she started out
> with so I am not interested in taking someone who has no plans
> to profit but just enjoy over ruining her standing with
> companies whose interest it is to profit.
>

Alexa? As in this Alexa on Adultwork?

[one eyed jack]

Yup. Shoot me for being divvy. But its no secret if anyone saw it on the UKAP site anyway