Rachel Travers Set and a ?

This forum is intended for the discussion and sharing of information on the topic of British born and British-based female performers in hard-core adult films and related matters.
Chris

Rachel Travers Set and a ?

Post by Chris »

Hello All

A nice teasing set featuring the very lovely Rachel T



Had a quick tour of Jenn Martin's site (Nottingham Models) the other day and saw a couple of pictures of Rachel and she sure does look to have grown a bit around the chest area??? Has she had a boob job?

Cheers
Chris
bingo

Re: Rachel Travers Set and a ?

Post by bingo »

mex

Re: Rachel Travers Set and a ?

Post by mex »

mmmmmmm I used to be massively into Ms Travers, but recently I think she looks to "footballers wives/Baywatch" - she's seems to be going up the Americanised route- fake tits, ridiculously coiffuered barnets etc.

Back in the days of her 1st FC she was FUCKIN HOT! but recent developments have left me traumatised I tell thee!
Larry

Re: Rachel Travers Set and a ?

Post by Larry »

Don't no about how see looks, but i really hate those knickers/g string shes wearing in that phot shoot !!
Officer Dibble

Re: Rachel Travers Set and a ?

Post by Officer Dibble »

When we belatedly discovered Rachel last year I thought - Hurrah! Another genuinely glamorous model to add to the less than half a dozen genuinely glamorous British 'glamour' models that we might use more than once. But when she recently announced that she was having a boob job I was shocked and horrified. I tried to convince myself that it would probably turn out OK - like Louise Hodges or Teresa May where you can find yourself forgetting that they have had boob jobs because it?s not intrusive. However, when I saw the sample pics of Rachel on the Notts Models site my heart sank. Ruined. ?Synthetic? and ?upturned basins? were the words that immediately sprang to mind. Why would a naturally gorgeous girl want to adopt the unappealing look of a cheap, idiotic, LA porn tart? Does she think she will get more work? I regret that she probably won't get anymore from these quarters. It's hard enough these days shifting videos of nice appealing girls, never mind porn slapper clones. Punters on the whole aren't interested in that crap. This is a real head bagging moment for me. She was gorgeous and now she's gone and fucked it. Why, why, why? I tell you, I'm rapidly loosing faith and interest in all this shit.

Anyhow, regarding Rachel's barnet; any girl who has the imagination, taste, class, style and individuality to choose a hairstyle other than that fucking straight, blonde, hair pasted down, just stepped out of the shower style or that fucking blonde IRA punishment squad cut has got to have something about her, which makes it all the more tragic and painful for me.

Dibble
Squin

Re: Rachel Travers Set and a ?

Post by Squin »

Poor Rachel Travers, it really pisses me off when tossers on BGAFD
think they have a right to comment on how a girl should look, we are the
1st place to have her new-look pics and I think she looks gorgeous hence the reason we listed her.
I'm not a huge fan of boob jobs, but Rachel must have thought hard about it and its her choice, if you dont like her new look then we wont expect you to book her but i know lots of people do and will book her.

I am 100% sure Rachel won't lose sleep over a couple of guys lack of enthusiasm.

But if any of you guys who love to pull girls down for what they do want the number of a good penis extension surgeon drop me an email im sure if you look down you need one
m

Re: Rachel Travers Set and a ?

Post by m »

fair dos, we're all entitled to our opinions. Why the penis remark though? My penis happens to be rather large and doesnt need any lengthening or otherwise.
George

Re: Rachel Travers Set and a ?

Post by George »

Squin wrote:

> Poor Rachel Travers, it really pisses me off when tossers on
> BGAFD
> think they have a right to comment on how a girl should look,
> we are the
> 1st place to have her new-look pics and I think she looks
> gorgeous hence the reason we listed her.
> I'm not a huge fan of boob jobs, but Rachel must have thought
> hard about it and its her choice, if you dont like her new look
> then we wont expect you to book her but i know lots of people
> do and will book her.

Tossers, are we, because we prefer the real to the fake?

Actually, we DO have a right to comment. Rachel has chosen to make a business out of selling her looks, and we as customers are perfectly entitled to comment on the commodity she is selling.

Selling fake tits, like fake fur, fake Rolexes, and indeed any sort of fake, is both fraudulent and in very poor taste. You say you actually like fake tits. Hard to believe, but if so then you probably like Coca-cola, margarine, Tex-mex, cheap hamburgers, artificial stone-cladding, nylon sheets and Arndale Centres. You have a perfect right to like these things, but don't expect anybody to congratulate you on your good taste.

George

Re: Rachel Travers Set and a ?

Post by George »

My last sentence has been edited by management and in its present form misleadingly suggests that I want to know what your site is. I don't.
Squin

Re: Rachel Travers Set and a ?

Post by Squin »

Well actually i think that as married to a beautiful girl who is in the business and the comments you have made about her on here you will have to agree George that i have very good taste.

Plus no where did i say i liked fake tits in fact i said i am not a great fan of them, but was more upset the way that she was i my view slated for making a choice to have the operation.

But with the way this country is, i am not suprised by the comments made on here, as with everyone no matter what industry they are in people in this country love to take you to the top of your choosen proffesion and then slag you off till they bring you back down again.

In my View one of the reasons why alot of the girls go to the states.
Post Reply