"I know, I'll use the old misogynistic, bigoted, chauvinistic, disrespect for ?wimin? gambit. Always goes down well on the bgafd." But that's so pass?' nowadays Mark. Couldn't you be a bit more original?
Didnt know i had used it, but as all our models know we are a studio run by a model for models and until someone stands up for them we will see lots of good models fall by the way side.
"And it was because I had such a high opinion of her that my comments were somewhat emotional"
and very public............ what if she has had the operation done and doesnt like the results herself....i stand by whats been said these comments should of be made to her direct and not so public.
Rachel Travers Set and a ?
-
Officer Dibble
Re: Rachel Travers Set and a ?
"can I ust say to officer dibble what bollocks mate,"
Of course you can.
"what gives you the casting vote on all things british past and present,"
Well, er, I'm a pretty cool porn dude.
"do you mean to say you could not shoot 5 minutes of rachel travers and pass her off as your latest leading lady, starring in your latest blockbusting batch of ?seen? anciet archive material,"
Er, what?
"if you shot/bought original material maybe you could be in a position to comment, until then. shut the fuck up....
But I'm shooting and buying original material all the time. Didn?t you see all the HCC stuff that me ?n? P R Mann put together for all the lucky Britsex punters? There's two months work gone into all this. So with all due respect crofter, maybe you should shut the fuck up till you can think of something more intelligent, interesting and edifying to regale the bgafd hordes with.
Dibble
Of course you can.
"what gives you the casting vote on all things british past and present,"
Well, er, I'm a pretty cool porn dude.
"do you mean to say you could not shoot 5 minutes of rachel travers and pass her off as your latest leading lady, starring in your latest blockbusting batch of ?seen? anciet archive material,"
Er, what?
"if you shot/bought original material maybe you could be in a position to comment, until then. shut the fuck up....
But I'm shooting and buying original material all the time. Didn?t you see all the HCC stuff that me ?n? P R Mann put together for all the lucky Britsex punters? There's two months work gone into all this. So with all due respect crofter, maybe you should shut the fuck up till you can think of something more intelligent, interesting and edifying to regale the bgafd hordes with.
Dibble
-
Officer Dibble
Re: Rachel Travers Set and a ?
I'll concede that CC is a gent, but Crofter? He comes across as a drunken boor heckling from the back of a workingmen's club... No offence crofter mate.
Dibble.
Dibble.
-
Cornish Chris
Re: Rachel Travers Set and a ?
Officer Dibble wrote:
> I don't set out to fall out with
> anyone. I just say what I think and say what I feel on the
> bgafd (one of the few places that affords me that luxury) and I
> pay little regard to whether I may be upturning anyone's apple
> cart or not. But those thoughts are the real, raw, uncensored,
> usually well-considered and objective thoughts of Officer
> Dibble, devoid of the platitudinous bullshit that we are all
> guilty of inflicting on each other every day. Hey, it's pure
> stuff. It?s good stuff. It?s simply not available in many
> lesser establishments.
>
> Dibble
Yes Dibble it is beautifully written, with a degree of consideration.
But my point still stands we are talking about human beings with
emotions and feeling here.
Therefore I would make a stance that if something is not to your taste
you think it but don't say it for the world to see.
Nobody wants to fall out or cross keyboards, and I think it is refreshing that the chance to conduct debate is available.
However real, raw, uncensored, pure & good stuff (debatable), please remember that comments such as "Cheap Idiotic LA Porn Tart" are neither constructive or desirable, and I am suprised the moderators left that section of your post intact.
We will agree to differ on this one, you play things your way and we will do things our way.
I hope you respect the fact that in our opinion we were acting with good intensions in general, and I will respect that you were also.
However this is an emotive subject and if keyboards need to be crossed again they will be.....bring me my trusty white charger.
CC
> I don't set out to fall out with
> anyone. I just say what I think and say what I feel on the
> bgafd (one of the few places that affords me that luxury) and I
> pay little regard to whether I may be upturning anyone's apple
> cart or not. But those thoughts are the real, raw, uncensored,
> usually well-considered and objective thoughts of Officer
> Dibble, devoid of the platitudinous bullshit that we are all
> guilty of inflicting on each other every day. Hey, it's pure
> stuff. It?s good stuff. It?s simply not available in many
> lesser establishments.
>
> Dibble
Yes Dibble it is beautifully written, with a degree of consideration.
But my point still stands we are talking about human beings with
emotions and feeling here.
Therefore I would make a stance that if something is not to your taste
you think it but don't say it for the world to see.
Nobody wants to fall out or cross keyboards, and I think it is refreshing that the chance to conduct debate is available.
However real, raw, uncensored, pure & good stuff (debatable), please remember that comments such as "Cheap Idiotic LA Porn Tart" are neither constructive or desirable, and I am suprised the moderators left that section of your post intact.
We will agree to differ on this one, you play things your way and we will do things our way.
I hope you respect the fact that in our opinion we were acting with good intensions in general, and I will respect that you were also.
However this is an emotive subject and if keyboards need to be crossed again they will be.....bring me my trusty white charger.
CC
-
Cornish Chris
Re: Rachel Travers Set and a ?
Thanks for conceding that I am a gent.
Can I quote you on that ?? And use it in references ??
Right bed.... god knows I need the beauty sleep.
CC.
Can I quote you on that ?? And use it in references ??
Right bed.... god knows I need the beauty sleep.
CC.
-
Officer Dibble
Re: Rachel Travers Set and a ?
"The difference between us I fear is that we are modern thinking caring people,"
Oh, Christ! Oh God! You don't mean...I mean?you?re not?not?a, a.... GAURDIAN READER! ?Aarrrghh! Aarrrghh! ! The horror! The horror! Aarrrghhhhh!?..
But seriously Chris, your attempts to put me in the same misogynistic 'wimmin' hating bracket same as Mark did is bullshit, bollocks and nonsense. I don't think your quite clear what you are saying and have obviously not fully studied the archived works and thoughts of Officer Dibble. Oh of course I understand that at a cursory glance at one of my scribblings could give that impression - especially if it's a piece berating 'lairy slappers' and the like. But the Officer Dibble is much deeper and more complex than that, and if you carefully study what I say you will see that I am much more even-handed and objective. It's just that some of the folks round here who have 'issues' jump on the negative bits.
It shows that you are a true officer and gent that even though you disagree with my call that you concede my train of though is professionally correct. I respect and admire that kind of thing.
Dibble
Oh, Christ! Oh God! You don't mean...I mean?you?re not?not?a, a.... GAURDIAN READER! ?Aarrrghh! Aarrrghh! ! The horror! The horror! Aarrrghhhhh!?..
But seriously Chris, your attempts to put me in the same misogynistic 'wimmin' hating bracket same as Mark did is bullshit, bollocks and nonsense. I don't think your quite clear what you are saying and have obviously not fully studied the archived works and thoughts of Officer Dibble. Oh of course I understand that at a cursory glance at one of my scribblings could give that impression - especially if it's a piece berating 'lairy slappers' and the like. But the Officer Dibble is much deeper and more complex than that, and if you carefully study what I say you will see that I am much more even-handed and objective. It's just that some of the folks round here who have 'issues' jump on the negative bits.
It shows that you are a true officer and gent that even though you disagree with my call that you concede my train of though is professionally correct. I respect and admire that kind of thing.
Dibble
-
Cornish Chris
Re: Rachel Travers Set and a ?
At last some sense, as I previously stated and I am sure Mark would agree
this thread is nothing to do with porn it is about people treating people with respect.
Sticks & Stones may break my Bones, but names will never hurt me.
Sadly they do often hurt.
CC.
this thread is nothing to do with porn it is about people treating people with respect.
Sticks & Stones may break my Bones, but names will never hurt me.
Sadly they do often hurt.
CC.
-
Crimpo
Dibble Dibble Dibble
Oh another little fandango on the BGAFD - it seems there are always two golden rules to every dust-up on the Board. 1) Officer Dibble will be in the middle of it. 2) Officer Dibble will be wrong.
Right - to the matter in hand. Rachel Travers has had a boob job. OD liked Rachel's look but doesn't like boob jobs. Hence a very natural disappointment. We've all felt it at times when models we liked changed their appearance. In OD's case it also puts her outside his perceived market and so has removed a potential source of revenue. Disappointment doubled!!
That's fair enough - but OD you then wobble off into your traditional rant that - a) porn today is all crap, b) there hasn't been a decent model since Linda Leigh and Louise Hodges, c) there isn't enough prog rock in the charts nowadays. (OK I paraphrase and even put words into your mouth to make you like idiotic but then that is a debating tactic with which you are familiar to judge by the thread above)
As a general rule we can have hard-hitting debates on here without the abusive remarks about named models - you had a reasonable point Dibble (since there is a sizeable 'natural' market out there) but as so often it was weakened by over-robust fundamentalism.
Different producers produce different material - if it finds a market they survive if it doesn't they don't. Dibble has a market for his product - also a very good business reason for 'talking up' the models of the past - but its far from being the only market out there.
Right - to the matter in hand. Rachel Travers has had a boob job. OD liked Rachel's look but doesn't like boob jobs. Hence a very natural disappointment. We've all felt it at times when models we liked changed their appearance. In OD's case it also puts her outside his perceived market and so has removed a potential source of revenue. Disappointment doubled!!
That's fair enough - but OD you then wobble off into your traditional rant that - a) porn today is all crap, b) there hasn't been a decent model since Linda Leigh and Louise Hodges, c) there isn't enough prog rock in the charts nowadays. (OK I paraphrase and even put words into your mouth to make you like idiotic but then that is a debating tactic with which you are familiar to judge by the thread above)
As a general rule we can have hard-hitting debates on here without the abusive remarks about named models - you had a reasonable point Dibble (since there is a sizeable 'natural' market out there) but as so often it was weakened by over-robust fundamentalism.
Different producers produce different material - if it finds a market they survive if it doesn't they don't. Dibble has a market for his product - also a very good business reason for 'talking up' the models of the past - but its far from being the only market out there.
-
Officer Dibble
Re: Dibble Dibble Dibble
Officer Dibble WRONG?!! What herasy is this?!!
But anyway Crimpo, some good points here made in a reasonable rational manner. I'm afraid I'm to bushed to put up much of a spirited debate/defence (the morning after the night before.) So I'll just cut this one short be conceding that - You?re right of course. There isn't enough prog rock in the charts these days.
Dibble
But anyway Crimpo, some good points here made in a reasonable rational manner. I'm afraid I'm to bushed to put up much of a spirited debate/defence (the morning after the night before.) So I'll just cut this one short be conceding that - You?re right of course. There isn't enough prog rock in the charts these days.
Dibble
-
Spook
Re: Rachel Travers Set and a ?
Isn't it a fairly well known fact that good boob jobs get a model more work?
Models I've spoken to on this matter - Teresa Scott, Lana Cox and others have told me that new boobs = more work. & I'm sure that other models - Layla, Louise Hodges, Lynda Leigh etc etc have found this to be the case.
Dibble's customers may not like them, posters here may not like them, but they are in the minority - nothing wrong with that of course but they should recognise the fact.
I'm not saying that models get boob jobs solely to earn more money - but it is a happy side effect.
Models I've spoken to on this matter - Teresa Scott, Lana Cox and others have told me that new boobs = more work. & I'm sure that other models - Layla, Louise Hodges, Lynda Leigh etc etc have found this to be the case.
Dibble's customers may not like them, posters here may not like them, but they are in the minority - nothing wrong with that of course but they should recognise the fact.
I'm not saying that models get boob jobs solely to earn more money - but it is a happy side effect.