Rude posters.

A place to socialise and share opinions with other members of the BGAFD Community.
Snake Diamond
Posts: 1889
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

A New Asshole on BGAFD

Post by Snake Diamond »

I know alot of ppl on here (O/T Forum), also frequent the British Girls Forum. Well, this is a "Heads-Up" to a new FLAMING ASSHOLE on the British Girls Forum.

[edited by mod]
Snake Diamond,
Fangs that bite!
Deuce Bigolo
Posts: 9910
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: A New Asshole on BGAFD

Post by Deuce Bigolo »

Thanks all the same Snake but I'll pass

You might wish to read the last offical message in relation to such behaviour

last Aired 6/08/03 titled **IMPORTANT MESSAGE** by Woodgnome

cheers
B....OZ
steve56
Posts: 13579
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: A New Asshole on BGAFD

Post by steve56 »

tmiles post has been erased.
philk
Posts: 373
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: A New Asshole on BGAFD

Post by philk »

So its ok to say you think someone is gorgeous but not to say you dont? This board is supposed to be an open forum for people to express opinions and make comments about the UK porn industry so why is his opinion any less valid than anyone elses? If the post had been to say she was the best thing to come into porn in the last 20 years and the sexiest woman ever it wouldnt have been removed. Porn is no different to any other industry - different people like different things and whats one person thinks is the best think ever, someone else could think is complete shit.

When a person puts themselves into the public eye (irrespective of the industry / profession) they have to be prepared that not everyone will like them, what they do, what they say, how they look etc etc so I think the post should have been allowed to stay. If someone cant hack that (and Im not saying the girl mentioned cant nor that she asked for it to be removed) then they should consider a new career.

This is an example of big brother (in this case the mods) disagreeing with a post and therefore deciding it should be removed which, in my opinion, is wrong. The one thing that has always annoyed me about this otherwise great site (and more specifically the BGAFD forum) is the way the girls and producers who post here are treated as untouchables - they are given more slack than the average joe schmoe, allowed to say and do things that others wouldnt get away with.

By the way I have no opinion either way on the looks of the person in question and this post would have been the same irrespective of who the girl had been.

I know a lot of people are gonna flame and slag me off but I couldnt care less - Im doing what this board is all about, expressing an opinion.

Jason

woodgnome
Posts: 2432
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2019 6:01 pm

Re: A New Asshole on BGAFD

Post by woodgnome »

Jason wrote:

> So its ok to say you think someone is gorgeous but not to say
> you dont? This board is supposed to be an open forum for people
> to express opinions and make comments about the UK porn
> industry so why is his opinion any less valid than anyone
> elses?

this board is not an 'open forum' if by that you mean anyone can post anything that pops into their head. we have an faq which we enforce without favouritism. in this instance, i refer you to section 3.7.1 of the faq.

> This is an example of big brother (in this case the mods)
> disagreeing with a post and therefore deciding it should be
> removed which, in my opinion, is wrong. The one thing that has
> always annoyed me about this otherwise great site (and more
> specifically the BGAFD forum) is the way the girls and
> producers who post here are treated as untouchables - they are
> given more slack than the average joe schmoe, allowed to say
> and do things that others wouldnt get away with.

funnily enough, i removed an abusive post by a model only yesterday but then you wouldn't know that because i removed it. your reference to the untouchability of producers is also untrue. some of them have had more posts removed than we care to remember.

> By the way I have no opinion either way on the looks of the
> person in question and this post would have been the same
> irrespective of who the girl had been.
>
> I know a lot of people are gonna flame and slag me off but I
> couldnt care less - Im doing what this board is all about,
> expressing an opinion.
>
> Jason

and as long as you and any respondents do so within the confines of the faq, that's not a problem.
What?
Posts: 138
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: A New Asshole on BGAFD

Post by What? »

The only thing I would like to say on the subject, is that when I (and a few others) said we disliked someone performing while heavily pregnant, we got our posts deleted.
While it is totally up to the mods what they allow on their boards, surely expressing opinions shouldnt be a problem should it? Especially seeing as that opinion was hardly radical.

WHAT?
jj
Posts: 28225
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Rude posters.

Post by jj »

Arseholes. Bollocks. Cuntface.

Rude enough for you?
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
Deuce Bigolo
Posts: 9910
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: A New Asshole on BGAFD

Post by Deuce Bigolo »

Stands to reason although....

I still don't understand why being called an animal name is offensive

cheers
B....OZ
Locked