egafd.com

I agree - the problem is the phrase 'reasonable force'. It's subjective not objective.

However twunts like this deserve a beating.

Surely you used reasonable force. If he kept coming back for more, you used reasonable force several times, which may add up to what may seem as excessive force, but was reasonable for each incident in order to 'eliminate the threat'.

mucho_matcho_man wrote:

> Goths deserve a beating just for being goths - the stupid
> motherfucking little twats.

OI!

Being invloved in the goth/rock/alternative scenes.... Goth's are about one of the best low trouble groups out there.

I have no fears leaving my camera bag, with some kit, laying around while shooting knowing it will be there when I come back to it.

Likewise I've never felt "out of sorts" at a goth venue, be that "trad" or "EBM" where as many a 'nilla venue I'm always looking over my shoulder for some twatty townie to kick off.

Same with rockers and bikers...

on the whole if there is trouble, its bleedingly obvious and in front of you... with townies usualy the first you know something has kicked off is 1 second after being clocked from behind.

Jon Xx

Deserve a beating? Not something I'd expect from a man of the cloth.......

Just say i hate violence i tend to try to talk my way out of it act scared.Ace wrote:

> Johnnyboy 22 wrote:
>
> > Well i must confess i do box a bit,
>
>
> Now you certainly don't want to tell Old Bill THAT!!!
> Any solicitor representing the filthy scum that hit you will
> cite that you used 'UN-reasonable force in a prolonged and
> sustained attack'
> Keep the Hatton stuff to yourself mate
>
>

I'm modernising. In fact I aim to be the 'Kung Fu Vicar' a bit like the Equaliser.


More tea anyone?

GBH or GBH of the earholes?