Macus' unacceptable post

[chatterji]

Accepted. But the site name is still a wrong'un. It's not me misconstruing what the site's about - I would be massively alarmed if paedophiles felt so safe that they were happy to post on open forums - it's just that I'm very much against the whole 'Lolita' titillation thing in porn. Whatever adults do consensually is cool with me, but anything that undermines that notion of maturity needs to be considered carefully. Using Lolita-style URLs is a serious issue because it blurs the line dangerously, and just because this gets more hits or shifts more product is no justification. That's not whipped-up media hysteria or moral majority bleating. It's just my opinion.

[Lizard]

Storm in a "B" cup.

[joe king]

Lizard wrote:
>
> Storm in a "B" cup.

what a luvely brew!

[TopShelfBlue]

Chatterji wrote: "Whatever adults do consensually is cool with me, but anything that??"

Key words there, 'adults' and 'consenually'.

You can't say "I believe in freedom of speech/movement" and then shove in a "but I don't like this or that."

[jj]

Oh yes you can.
Look up the difference between 'liberty' and 'licence'.