Macus' unacceptable post

A read-only and searchable archive of posts made to the BGAFD forum from 11/08/2000 to 14/03/2003.
chatterji

Macus' unacceptable post

Post by chatterji »

Just want to say that I think the site name cited in the previous post from Macus is absolutely appalling. I don't care what kind of site it is, the name has potential paedophile connotations. Particularly in light of the Cambs girls' situation, it's just totally unacceptable. For fuck's sake let's show some responsibility and avoid giving the censorship brigade this kind of material to taint all porn with.
Diem

Re: Macus' unacceptable post

Post by Diem »

WTF?

D
Officer Dibble

Re: Macus' unacceptable post

Post by Officer Dibble »

Macus is indeed a sad boy and I trust I speak for all here when I say - We're not interested in naffing teenies, we like shagging mature ladies with big tits n' asses. Ladies with a bit of depth and experience who know how to handle a cock. So, t' fuck with teenies and teeny lovers! There's saming wrong wiv' 'em!

Officer Dibble
Officer Dibble

Re: Macus' unacceptable post

Post by Officer Dibble »

Anacronym alert!

officer Dibble.
Hornetbloke

Re: Macus' unacceptable post

Post by Hornetbloke »

Oh I dunno, The Tweenies can be quite good sometimes although I personally prefer Teletubbies.....
buttsie

Re: Macus' unacceptable post

Post by buttsie »

Another storm in a teacup
Tiny=paedophile

Everything should be taken into context when generalising.

If it were that offensive the moderators would delete it
Having actually looked at the link i can't see the problem is.
Mpegs of female legal aged pornstars having sex.

Infact one well known European Vanda(Vitus)of Private is there-very cute but hardly
paedophile material.

cheers
B...OZ
woodgnome

O/T Re: Macus' unacceptable post

Post by woodgnome »

bona fide paedophile oriented posts are, of course, unacceptable on this forum, as my "curt" response to a recent enquiry in that direction by a poster should have made plain.

however, there will always be elements within the porn industry that will try and appeal to whatever is most taboo within contemporary culture, even if they wouldn't touch the real thing with a barge pole. in the majority of cases, it amounts to nothing more than a crude attempt to cash in on the historically transgressive roots of pornography (something it gets harder to do with each passing year, as we become ever less concerned with relative concepts of obscenity).

hence, the term 'lolita' has been all but rendered worthless as a means of locating the sort of material to which that phrase originally alluded. on a less controversial note, a parallel can also be drawn with the word 'amateur' - once it was perceived there was a substantial market for such material, it quickly became a marketing tool for producers who simply used established models, albeit in grungier 'amateur' type settings.

in other words, you might find the subtext behind the use of the word 'tiny' to be grossly offensive but the majority of potential visitors will have no confusion whatsoever about what the actual content of that site will be - i.e completely legal.

strangely enough, those marketing to paedophiles tend not to display their wares in quite such a brazen manner. they know that those interested in 'the real thing' will find a way to them via icq channels, newsgroups and personal contacts, rather than search engines or obvious domain names. in other words, it pays them NOT to advertise.

what the sad scenario of the two 10yr olds currently missing has to do with any of this, is beyond me. the reason coverage of this potential tragedy is all over the news, is BECAUSE it is so very unusual. this country is one of the safest in the world for children (along with norway and japan, iirc) in terms of child murder rates: .

unfortunately, when a situation such as this does arise the media finds it hard to resist trying to play the public like a violin, using the emotive issue of our childrens safety as its song sheet. it never makes for a pretty tune and any hope of keeping some sort of perspective usually gets drowned out.
Officer Dibble

Re: O/T Re: Macus' unacceptable post

Post by Officer Dibble »

> unfortunately, when a situation such as this does arise the
> media finds it hard to resist trying to play the public like
> a violin, using the emotive issue of our childrens safety as
> its song sheet. it never makes for a pretty tune and any hope
> of keeping some sort of perspective usually gets drowned out.


Indeed. In fact Officer Dibble pointed this kind of thing out a couple of days ago.

Dibble Dibble.
Voice of Treason

Re: O/T Re: Macus' unacceptable post

Post by Voice of Treason »

If you look at the front page, all the girls are 20-22 (and bloody gorgeous to) so what's the problem?
Zipper

Re: O/T Re: Macus' unacceptable post

Post by Zipper »

And its all about perception of what you read.

As for me, I thought it meant humping dwarfs, Hi-Ho etc., perhaps it is the reader who needs to revise his thinking, it looks like the rest of the posters are level headed.

Zipper
Locked