O/T very disturbing What next?

A read-only and searchable archive of posts made to the BGAFD forum from 11/08/2000 to 14/03/2003.
joe king

Re: O/T very disturbing What next?

Post by joe king »

I don't know who is more 'sick', the people who made and 'enjoy' the video or the hypocritical vigilante justice team that the 'sane' forum members seem to be.

The sight of this 'sickness' seems to bring a different type of 'sickness'.
Jeremy Clarkson

Re: O/T very disturbing What next?

Post by Jeremy Clarkson »

Werent they real cockroaches that got stamped on in Starship Troopers?
judas

Re: O/T very disturbing What next?

Post by judas »

hey joe king what would you like to do with this scum its bleeding heart liberals like you that help pondlife like this thrive fuck talking about what went wrong when they were young and all that physiological bullshit its animals today kids next.
Ace

Re: O/T very disturbing What next?

Post by Ace »

Actually Jude, its psycho-analysis you were 'trying' to say, and besides, Joe has his opinion, just like you, so let him have it instead of having a chance to rant because it doesnt fit in with your chain of thoughts
mart

Re: O/T very disturbing What next?

Post by mart »

Thanks Joe; good to know there are some reasonable people on this forum.
Waiting to see the response when we start bombing the shit out of the civilians in Iraq.
Mart
PS. Why is it always motorists who should be above the law?
marcusallen

Re: O/T very disturbing What next?

Post by marcusallen »

Hey Joe,
Put it another way maybe, you come accros as one who is condoning this type of activity to the detriment of posters who genuinly believe that this is sick etc.
I feel that is not your intention and as for hypocrasy, it remains to be seen. Sure, a lot of people sound off about a lot of different subjects, it is their right and surely any "normal" human being would wish the guy in question a swift(or otherwise)demise but if they are only "all talk" and by that, I certainly mean no offence, because cold-blooded violoence/retribution does not occur naturally, then they should not be crtised/demeaned.
As you are well aware, I have stated on more than one occassion on this forum-and indeed in life in general-that violence is to be abhorred. But to the great detriment of the human race, it is sometimes the only solution. The great question of course is who administers it and under what circumstances.
Common "Justice" as we know it is crap, without normal priorities;indeed the whole Justice System in this "Sceptered Isle" is antiquated and largely fucked up.
But our political masters deem it to be OK and fiddle every now and then, like recently with proposed new rules concerning Graffiti and "on-the-spot-fines" etc. All of which are political bullshit designed to woo the voter(punter).
As porn lovers, we are often slagged offically as being depraved and corrupt (to quote the Act), but we all know that this is an insane/unwarranted categorisation, however, political priorities lie elsewhere.
Officer Dibble.

Re: O/T very disturbing What next?

Post by Officer Dibble. »



I guess that's aimed at my post.

Not suggesting that anyone should be above the law, it's just a question of what the laws are. Many motoring laws and policies nowadays are dictated by car hating, Guardian loving, hand wringing, poncy, middleclass twats. The problem is - due to their anti-car dogma - they tend to make the kind of loopy laws that go down well in small labour constituency activist meetings - the general intention being to make life as difficult and unpleasant for motorists as possible. They don't speak for me or millions of other motorists who wish they would just fuck off! Instead of leaning on honest (ish) decent (ish) taxpaying (ish) motorists, why aren?t they speaking out against the real moronic scumbags off our society - the car thieves, joy riders, arsonists, muggers, vandals and indeed pet tortures? What?s wrong with this picture?

And remember, the fuckers who are making laws now only have a mandate from 25% of the population. So, 75% of the population do not give their consent.

And civilians in Iraq? I don't know, can't explain it, but I don't feel particularly concerned. I feel far more upset about the cruelty inflicted on the animals and pets mentioned earlier. I guess the best thing the Iraqi's can do is boot Saddam out while the going's good.

Officer Dibble.
joe king

Re: O/T very disturbing What next?

Post by joe king »

'Put it another way maybe, you come accros as one who is condoning this type of activity to the detriment of posters who genuinly believe that this is sick etc.'

Do I think it is trivial - no. It is interesting how you got that impression. If I don't actively say it is sick then I condone it - right? I think it is more grey than black and white. There was a tate art nominee I think that had a 3d film or something of the death/killing/slaughter of a horse. Was september the 11th the sickest thing on tv? You can get the DVD and relive the experience. I just find it interesting how some humans can find non-human animals more emotive.
judas

Re: O/T very disturbing What next?

Post by judas »

how can you compare 9/11 to these sick fucks what those terrorists did was a political act the cretins that make these films are just sick fucks who are motivated by money or worse pleasure
vila

Re: O/T very disturbing What next?

Post by vila »

Sorry, Dibble, but I don't understand the buzz any human could get from this kind of obscenity - and I'm not pretending.
Locked