A controversial topic- "interaction"

[Ron T. Storm]

My view.

If you discuss it in advance with model and she agrees then fine. Don't suddenly suggest it on day of shoot or if model strictly doesn't work to b/g level.

I have shot a heck of a lot where the only interaction has been verbal interaction and happy to stick with that.

Only once did I interact without it be formalised in advance and that was because a model asked me to fist fuck her which I had joked about in emails to her and she then called my bluff as she really did want to be fist fucked.

The real issue is more regarding deceit rather than the act - where someone wants a shag but hides it behind being a photographer. The models I have shagged on camera have always known in advance about what my intentions were.

I have found honestly to be the best policy and also I do publish all my work for (I do believe a new Video of me and Vicki Peach is being posted tonight).

Regards,

Ron.

[Sarah Kelly]

Two very different sides for sure... The number of guys that ask for interaction with no consideration of certs is staggering... This ISN"T on the professional side , but it does make up a large number of the market place,jobswise...and a considerable portion of a models income can come from the amateur market... How many New girls/potentialy great models leave the biz/never enter it,because of this? How many girls might model, then find out about the "interaction"side , so the idea ends there due to personal preferences,boyfriends,family issues etc.... at least if they got started in the biz,made some decent contacts, stayed with it,they might increase their levels later...to the benefit of us all;fans and industry Pros and Amateurs alike. .... The pov bit im all for,(certed)and love the genre... the wanting to cop a feel when im trying to hold a pose?Well,I would certainly be wanting an extra quid to go towards a certain gentlemans Ukap drink !drink!

[myson]

I think it's been well covered in all of the above posts.

All I would reiterate is that "as long as everything has been discussed and agreed between the model/photographer/producer beforehand and that ALL performers are fully tested with up to date certificates" then it's ok.

Adding "levels" (that have not been discussed) on the day of the shoot is a definite no no.

Myson
!oldie!

[Matt P]

Just had what you mean by "interaction" explained to me. Serriously does this actually happen? I just think that goes beyond porn & not something I particulary like.

As far as certs go I think it's generally accepted that certs are a responsibility & not merely a courtesy. I don't have unprotected sexual contact in my personal life & have my test done every 2 weeks that's what I've picked up from guys I've spoken to the industry. It just seems then this maybe more to do with toggies maybe trying it on.

I'm not really sure what to make of this interaction thing in that in my view anything involing sexual contact should be certed.

[Daz Savage]

Fortunately this issue never arises for me because I'm so old and incredibly hideous that no model in her right mind would ever want any hankedy-pankedy... most can barely stand being in the same room as me - one or two girls couldn't bear to be in the same postal-code.

[william]

Its a free world and if this is between two parties and both agree then why not? The model earns extra money and the tog has a bit of fun - no one is hurt.

Certs need to be in place and both know the levels and limits of the shoot well before hand. Turning up and expecting a lingerie shoot to turn to a bukkake event with 60 guys aint fair on the poor lassie !

Must admit that I have partaken but its all been open and discussed and limits have been known and adhered to. (been a pain finding 60 guys though....

[Sarah Kelly]

Hey,dont knock it...some of us girlies like that Worn,rugged,real man look!wink! ..