Page 3 of 3
Re: Tanya
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 2:32 pm
by Essex Lad
Nope, I've just checked out your website and I'm proud to say my eyesight is perfect...
CFNM
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 2:36 pm
by Essex Lad
Just saw this posted -
It seems okay to me - four attractive models sucking and wanking some not especially attractive skinny bloke.
Is cfnm.net worse?
Re: Language guys
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 3:12 pm
by sparky
I agree that models should be spoken and referred to in a sexy but respectful manner, not as if being used or even abused with no thought for their feelings.
As Tanya says so long as in a playful light-hearted context limited use of slut, dirty bitch, and some four-letter words I can tolerate.
Similarly in a fun context and provided I knew the girl did not feel humiliated but was comfortable with what she was doing I can accept the petgirl style if not too extreme.
Once when enquiring to a model I was aiming to imply I would want her to dress in a slutty style, as I had done before, but she read that I was implying she was slut which was not what I intended. I subsequently changed my wording so this could not happen again.