Language guys

This forum is intended for the discussion and sharing of information on the topic of British born and British-based female performers in hard-core adult films and related matters.
Buckley
Posts: 73
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Language guys

Post by Buckley »

These are my thoughts, I have no agenda.

I always felt when I was a mere lad (Black and white, jerky, jumpy 8mm movies and Lasse Braun) that 'porn was exciting and "stimulating". Albeit self-stimulating.

These days even the titles deter me from watching!

Why must we persist in using words like: sluts, slags, bitches, whores, fat grannies etc. We just dehumanise and demean and I see no reason for it!

Our language is not that impoverished that we cannot title things more inventively, is it?
Snappy
Posts: 240
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Language guys

Post by Snappy »

I'm with you on this. Films with titles like that ultimately lead to porn becoming self-stimulating as there's no way I could get my wife to join me in watching them.

Snappy...
...the snap-happy chappy
Essex Lad
Posts: 2539
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Language guys

Post by Essex Lad »

I third that. I see no reason to use words like sluts or slags to describe models. I also find the petgirls thing totally demeaning - what is erotic about a girl being led around on a lead or in a cage?
Mysteryman
Posts: 878
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Language guys

Post by Mysteryman »

Ditto to the above three posts.
Peter
Posts: 2692
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Language guys

Post by Peter »

Agreed also.

We have need of you again, great king.
pasties24
Posts: 140
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Language guys

Post by pasties24 »

hear hear couldnt agree more
Essex Lad
Posts: 2539
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Language guys

Post by Essex Lad »

Can anyone tell me what is erotic about this? It's demeaning.

http://bgafd.co.uk/forum/read.php?f=5&i=199070&t=199070
a m playlist
Posts: 239
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Language guys

Post by a m playlist »

Essex Lad wrote:

> Can anyone tell me what is erotic about this? It's demeaning.
>
> http://bgafd.co.uk/forum/read.php?f=5&i=199070&t=199070

As I've said previously on a different thread it makes a change from guys allowing themselves to be degraded and humiliated in femdom and cfnm scenes!

Essex Lad
Posts: 2539
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Language guys

Post by Essex Lad »

I'm not sure that cfnm is actually that demeaning - it seems to be one of the most popular threads on xnxx. And I am sure many men would like to be wanked or sucked off by three or four women.

I'm not sure that many women have ever thought, "You know what would turn me on? Putting a dog lead on me."
a m playlist
Posts: 239
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Language guys

Post by a m playlist »

Essex Lad wrote:

> I'm not sure that cfnm is actually that demeaning - it seems to
> be one of the most popular threads on xnxx. And I am sure many
> men would like to be wanked or sucked off by three or four
> women.

Hmm. Have you not seen some of the images from such sites as cfnm.net, theenglishmansion.com and kinkykicks.net, to name but three? If they are not deemed demeaning to guys, then I don't know what could be termed demeaning!

Post Reply